2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building intimacy through linguistic choices, text structure and voices in political discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He gives a rhetorical analysis to political strategy and shows how the rhetorical approach embodied in concrete examples [28]. Reyes (2015) explores how intimacy with the audience gets built by linguistic variables. He finds that strategical deployment of lexical selection and discourse structure helps weld intimacy with the audience [29].…”
Section: The Previous Studies On Political Addressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He gives a rhetorical analysis to political strategy and shows how the rhetorical approach embodied in concrete examples [28]. Reyes (2015) explores how intimacy with the audience gets built by linguistic variables. He finds that strategical deployment of lexical selection and discourse structure helps weld intimacy with the audience [29].…”
Section: The Previous Studies On Political Addressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reyes (2015) explores how intimacy with the audience gets built by linguistic variables. He finds that strategical deployment of lexical selection and discourse structure helps weld intimacy with the audience [29]. Rossette (2017) analyzes the political oratory in four sampled political addresses from Barack Obama, Martin Luther King and Abraham Lincoln, aiming to explore how oratory helps construe discursive identities and shorten distance with the audience [30].…”
Section: The Previous Studies On Political Addressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to interrogating capitalist forms (commodities, brands, and corporations) as the ongoing achievement of semiotic practices of various kinds, a number of authors have also asked what novel forms emerge when such formulations are extended in new ways and in new domains. What happens to the brand form when nations, universities, ethnicities (Wang ), residential communities (Koh ), politicians (Reyes ; Sclafani ), and everyday persons (Gershon ) are formulated as brands (or vice versa; Koh )? As these ethnographic studies evince, such tropes of capital—be they on the commodity, the corporation, or the brand—are productive of much more than the ideological teloses of what they cite.…”
Section: Three Thematic Horizonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, consumers would prefer brands using a language style that can address the feelings of uncertainty and risk related to brands. The formal language style, because of its rigidness and precision, is widely used in professional settings to reduce perceived risks (Heylighen, 1999;Rennekamp & Witz, 2017;Reyes, 2015). This style is also consistent with consumers' opinion of a company being able to and working hard to solve a serious matter (Barcelos et al, 2018).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The informal language style is relationship-oriented and can be used to develop rapport between interlocutors (Gretry et al, 2017;Incelli, 2013;Rennekamp & Witz, 2017;Reyes, 2015). According to previous research, the informal language is a flexible and light way of communication that is conducive to the expressivity and interactivity (Beukeboom et al, 2015;Heylighen & Dewaele, 2002;Reyes, 2015).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%