IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2010.5586088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building low CO<inf>2</inf> solutions to the vehicle routing problem with Time Windows using an evolutionary algorithm

Abstract: An evolutionary Multi-Objective Algorithm (MOA) is used to investigate the trade-off between CO2 savings, distance and number of vehicles used in a typical vehicle routing problem with Time Windows (VRPTW). A problem set is derived containing three problems based on accurate geographical data which encapsulates the topology of streets as well as layouts and characteristics of junctions. This is combined with realistic speed-flow data associated with road-classes and a power-based instantaneous fuel consumption… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al., 2014), the Green Vehicle Routing Problem (G-VRP) (Lin et al, 2014), and G-VRP solution approaches (Park and Chae, 2014). The incorporation of environmental considerations into vehicle routing problems has led to the development of three categories of routing models, depending on how emissions or energy consumption are modeled: i) time-independent emissions (or energy) minimising vehicle routing models (Peng and Wang, 2009;Fagerholt et al, 2010;Urquhart et al, 2010;Suzuki 2011;Rao and Jin, 2012), ii) time-dependent emissions minimising vehicle routing models (Palmer, 2007;Figliozzi, 2010;Jabali et al, 2012), and iii) load-dependent vehicle routing models (Bektas and Laporte, 2011;Franceschetti et al, 2013;Demir et al, 2014;Ehmke et al, 2016). In this last category, called Pollution Routing models, there are time-dependent (Franceschetti et al, 2013;Ehmke et al, 2016) and time-independent (Bektas and Laporte, 2011;Demir et al, 2014) formulations depending on whether time varying traffic conditions are taken into account on estimating emissions or not.…”
Section: Previous Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2014), the Green Vehicle Routing Problem (G-VRP) (Lin et al, 2014), and G-VRP solution approaches (Park and Chae, 2014). The incorporation of environmental considerations into vehicle routing problems has led to the development of three categories of routing models, depending on how emissions or energy consumption are modeled: i) time-independent emissions (or energy) minimising vehicle routing models (Peng and Wang, 2009;Fagerholt et al, 2010;Urquhart et al, 2010;Suzuki 2011;Rao and Jin, 2012), ii) time-dependent emissions minimising vehicle routing models (Palmer, 2007;Figliozzi, 2010;Jabali et al, 2012), and iii) load-dependent vehicle routing models (Bektas and Laporte, 2011;Franceschetti et al, 2013;Demir et al, 2014;Ehmke et al, 2016). In this last category, called Pollution Routing models, there are time-dependent (Franceschetti et al, 2013;Ehmke et al, 2016) and time-independent (Bektas and Laporte, 2011;Demir et al, 2014) formulations depending on whether time varying traffic conditions are taken into account on estimating emissions or not.…”
Section: Previous Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They considered three traffic conditions: uncongested, somewhat congested and congested. Urquhart et al (2010) used evolutionary algorithms to solve VRPTW with CO 2 savings, distance and number of vehicles. Kuo (2010) proposed an algorithm for calculating traversed time and fuel consumption in TDVRP with regard to vehicle speed in his model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FCVRP has been extensively studied in the literature. Urquhart et al [19] focused on vehicle routing problem with time windows and studied the trade-offs between carbon dioxide savings, traveling distance, and the number of vehicles using evolutionary algorithms. The authors found out that up to 10% savings could be achieved.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%