2022
DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building ‘Next Generation’ after the pandemic: The implementation and implications of the EU Covid Recovery Plan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary evidence by Vanhercke and Verdun (2022) shows that despite the Commission and notably DG ECFIN being in the driving seat of the RRF, national actors have options too and especially social actors both at national and European level are strategically using the institutional structures of the revised Semester as a vehicle to ‘have a say’ in the RRF. Similarly, as stated by Schramm et al (2022, 3), “despite the various European steering mechanisms, the RRF retains a basic bottom‐up approach”. According to these scholars, the drafting of NRRPs largely depended on national authorities because of two main reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Preliminary evidence by Vanhercke and Verdun (2022) shows that despite the Commission and notably DG ECFIN being in the driving seat of the RRF, national actors have options too and especially social actors both at national and European level are strategically using the institutional structures of the revised Semester as a vehicle to ‘have a say’ in the RRF. Similarly, as stated by Schramm et al (2022, 3), “despite the various European steering mechanisms, the RRF retains a basic bottom‐up approach”. According to these scholars, the drafting of NRRPs largely depended on national authorities because of two main reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A different reading is provided by other scholars (Bokhorst & Corti, 2023;Ladi & Wolff, 2021;Schramm et al, 2022), according to which hypothesizing a fully hierarchical approach in the implementation of the RRF would be unrealistic. Preliminary evidence by Vanhercke and Verdun (2022) shows that despite the Commission and notably DG ECFIN being in the driving seat of the RRF, national actors have options too and especially social actors both at national and European level are strategically using the institutional structures of the revised Semester as a vehicle to 'have a say' in the RRF.…”
Section: Analysing the Impact Of The Rrf On National Social Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2020–21, the Member States correctly supported income maintenance first and then co‐ordinated at the EU level Next Generation (Schramm et al, 2022) – blending elements of demand stimulus via financial measures with macro‐economic policy co‐ordination and measures to re‐configure the supply (Fabbrini, 2022; on macro‐economic policy see D'Erman and Verdun, 2022). Analogies did not seem to fool the EU this time.…”
Section: Putting Flesh On the Conceptual Bonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article by Schramm et al . (2022) provides a punctual analysis of the development of the Recovery Plan, reviewing the various stages – from its conception to the legal process and, then, to the start of the implementation phase – and the various actors involved, with a particular focus on the relationship between EU institutions and the Member States. The article highlights the innovative character of NGEU vis‐à‐vis previous EU instruments and practices for managing economic/financial crises.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%