2016
DOI: 10.17781/p002032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Ontologies for Digital Forensic Terminologies

Abstract: Digital forensics (DF) is a relatively new discipline with a lot of technical and non-technical terminologies that can be hard to comprehend. During a timeintensive digital forensic investigation process, for example, investigators may at times encounter several new terminologies. In such a scenario, the time required to unearth and analyse the root cause of a potential security incident might be influenced by the complexity involved in resolving the meaning of new terminologies encountered. The difficulty lie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, in a smart intelligent city network, digital or smart devices are connected via ad‐hoc networks and the presence of mobile devices brings about complexities when a digital incident is detected. As a result, one would allow the collection of potential digital evidence 37,38 that can be distributed across the aforementioned CIR, SIR, and MIR databases for purposes of sharing useful investigative forensic knowledge. In this smart city, forensic intelligence could easily be gathered across different connected devices and this form of forensic intelligence could easily be used to link the perpetrator to the crime.…”
Section: Potential Use Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in a smart intelligent city network, digital or smart devices are connected via ad‐hoc networks and the presence of mobile devices brings about complexities when a digital incident is detected. As a result, one would allow the collection of potential digital evidence 37,38 that can be distributed across the aforementioned CIR, SIR, and MIR databases for purposes of sharing useful investigative forensic knowledge. In this smart city, forensic intelligence could easily be gathered across different connected devices and this form of forensic intelligence could easily be used to link the perpetrator to the crime.…”
Section: Potential Use Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies are used for representing and reasoning about domain knowledge. Karie and Kebande [ 30 ] propose that existing tools should incorporate new approaches to assist in resolving or clarifying the meaning of new terminologies used during the investigation process. Ontologies will generate a common definition, knowledge and understanding of digital forensics domain terminologies.…”
Section: Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation of an ontology comprises four main steps: 1) digital forensics terminology database; 2) develop terminology semantic annotations; 3) reasoning engine; and 4) terminology semantic repository. The critical steps focus on the meaning of digital forensic terminologies during a digital forensic investigation [ 30 ].…”
Section: Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper [12] the authors stated that digital forensics is a relatively new discipline with various technical and non-technical terminologies that can be hard to comprehend. The main problem addressed by the authors is that there is no approach in digital forensics that can help investigators in reasoning concerning the perceived meaning of different digital forensics terminologies encountered during a digital forensics investigation process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%