2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56279-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Peace Through Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of the interview, the participants were asked to answer three questionnaires:A sociodemographic questionnaire, which included age, marital status, education, and health status (Dekel & Nuttman-Shwartz, 2009). The Resilience Research Center Adult Resilience Measure (RRC-ARM), which measures social–ecological resilience in adult populations (Liebenberg & Moore, 2018; Hebrew version by Al-Krenawi, 2017). This measure consists of 28 statements reflecting individual, relational, and contextual resilience processes (Liebenberg et al., 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the end of the interview, the participants were asked to answer three questionnaires:A sociodemographic questionnaire, which included age, marital status, education, and health status (Dekel & Nuttman-Shwartz, 2009). The Resilience Research Center Adult Resilience Measure (RRC-ARM), which measures social–ecological resilience in adult populations (Liebenberg & Moore, 2018; Hebrew version by Al-Krenawi, 2017). This measure consists of 28 statements reflecting individual, relational, and contextual resilience processes (Liebenberg et al., 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Resilience Research Center Adult Resilience Measure (RRC-ARM), which measures social–ecological resilience in adult populations (Liebenberg & Moore, 2018; Hebrew version by Al-Krenawi, 2017). This measure consists of 28 statements reflecting individual, relational, and contextual resilience processes (Liebenberg et al., 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%