2016 International Conference on Automatic Control and Dynamic Optimization Techniques (ICACDOT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icacdot.2016.7877661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Personalized and Non Personalized recommendation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most recommender systems exploit well-known techniques such as content-based and collaborative filtering in order to provide users with personalized suggestions [34], based on the ideas that they will like similar items to those they liked in the past (content-based filtering), or items that are appreciated by other users with similar tastes (collaborative filtering). Non-personalized recommenders [9,10,35], on the contrary, offer the same recommendations to all their users. For example, they select items to recommend based on criteria such as freshness, some editor's choice, item features (e.g., brand, author, product category), product associations or, more often than not, popularity.…”
Section: Non-personalized Recommendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most recommender systems exploit well-known techniques such as content-based and collaborative filtering in order to provide users with personalized suggestions [34], based on the ideas that they will like similar items to those they liked in the past (content-based filtering), or items that are appreciated by other users with similar tastes (collaborative filtering). Non-personalized recommenders [9,10,35], on the contrary, offer the same recommendations to all their users. For example, they select items to recommend based on criteria such as freshness, some editor's choice, item features (e.g., brand, author, product category), product associations or, more often than not, popularity.…”
Section: Non-personalized Recommendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recommender systems, however, may be designed (e.g., for practical or juridical reasons) to provide their users with non-personalized recommendations [9,10]. As stated by Ricci et al [11], for example, non-personalized recommendations are typical of magazines and newspapers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy takes ratings given by user for any item from the large catalog of item catalog of ratings given by the user. This large catalog is referred as user-item matrix [21]. Figure 3 explains collaborative filtering with an example of recommending movie to the user.…”
Section: Collaborative Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from 0 to 5 and is calculated as Score=round (MEAN (ratings)*10) [3]. On the other hand, some websites may display graphs with top-N items based on highest average ratings, while others use percentage of the people who rated an item good or bad.…”
Section: Non-personalized Recommendation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy for a user to interpret the results [3]  As only the highly rated items gets displayed, it becomes easy to implement [6]  Data collection is relatively easier in this technique due to limited number of variable required [6] Demerits.  It lacks personal appeal as it does not account for user specific attributes [3]  These systems face challenges in clustered diverse population [3] Product Association Approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%