2019
DOI: 10.3233/sw-190348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building relatedness explanations from knowledge graphs

Abstract: Knowledge graphs (KGs) are a key ingredient to complement search results, discover entities and their relations and support several knowledge discovery tasks. We face the problem of building relatedness explanations, that is, graphs that can explain how a pair of entities is related in a KG. Explanations can be used in a variety of tasks; from exploratory search to query answering. We formalize the notion of explanation and present two algorithms. The first, E4D (Explanations from Data), assembles explanations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure is based on the Triple Frequency defined as T F (p i , p j )=log(1 + C i,j ), where C i,j counts the number of times the predicates p i and p j link the same subjects and objects. Moreover, it uses the Inverse Triple Frequency defined as IT F (p j , E)=log |E| |{pi:Ci,j >0}| (Pirrò 2019). Based on TF and ITF, for each pair of predicates p i and p j we can build a (symmetric) matrix C M where each element is C M (i, j)=T F (p i , p j ) × IT F (p j , E).…”
Section: Triple Line Graph Edge Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This measure is based on the Triple Frequency defined as T F (p i , p j )=log(1 + C i,j ), where C i,j counts the number of times the predicates p i and p j link the same subjects and objects. Moreover, it uses the Inverse Triple Frequency defined as IT F (p j , E)=log |E| |{pi:Ci,j >0}| (Pirrò 2019). Based on TF and ITF, for each pair of predicates p i and p j we can build a (symmetric) matrix C M where each element is C M (i, j)=T F (p i , p j ) × IT F (p j , E).…”
Section: Triple Line Graph Edge Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This affects the dynamics of the graph thus having a direct impact on network embedding approaches like Deepwalk or node2vec that are based on the computation of random walks. To tackle this seconds challenge, we introduce a mechanism to weight the edges of G L based on predicate relatedness (Pirrò 2019). The weight of an edge between nodes of G L is equal to the semantic relatedness between the predicates in the triples of G represented by the two nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are approaches which provide explanations of such relationships to users. For example, [107,108] propose a method for generating explanations of relationships between entities in the form of most informative paths between the entities. The approach can be extended to explaining relationships among datasets which contain related entities.…”
Section: Analysis Of Semantic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this seconds challenge, we introduce two mechanisms to weight the edges of G L . The first, specific for knowledge graphs, assigns weights on the basis of predicate relatedness [14]. The weight of an edge between nodes of G L is equal to the semantic relatedness between the predicates in the triples of G represented by the two nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%