2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36560-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Reliable Web Services Compositions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A Web service is a self-contained modular program built with XML, SOAP, WSDL and UDDI specifications that can be discovered and invoked across the Internet ( [6,7]). A transactional Web service is a Web service that emphasizes transactional properties for its characterization and correct usage.…”
Section: Transactional Composite Web Services 31 Transactional Web Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Web service is a self-contained modular program built with XML, SOAP, WSDL and UDDI specifications that can be discovered and invoked across the Internet ( [6,7]). A transactional Web service is a Web service that emphasizes transactional properties for its characterization and correct usage.…”
Section: Transactional Composite Web Services 31 Transactional Web Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical Web service applications include business-to-business integration (B2B), business process integration and management, e-sourcing and content distribution. Web service interfaces and bindings are defined, described and discovered by XML parsers, supporting direct XML message-based interactions with other services and applications via Internet-based protocols like SOAP [30]. Standards for service description and discovery such as the Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI) [33] specification are designed to function in a fashion similar to white pages or yellow pages, where businesses and services can be looked up by name and/or by standard service taxonomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a client (the service composer), or a middleware service acting on behalf of a client, may exploit those descriptions for specifying and executing a (open-nested) transaction over a set of Web services whose termination is dictated by the outcomes of the transactional operations invoked on the individual services. Such a concern is particularly addressed in the WSTx [15] and WebTransact [18] frameworks. However, these approaches are not sufficient for comprehensively expressing the recovery behavior of a service.…”
Section: Specifying Recovery Behavior Of Web Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The language introduced in [2] allows specifying transactional behavior of conversations. However, it uses a list of pre-defined transactional properties in a way similar to approaches that annotates individual operations with transactional properties [15,18], hence reducing the language's expressiveness. Furthermore, existing conversation languages do not address timing issues, except for CS-WS [9] that introduces an additional timeout attribute associated to operations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%