To support the implementation of research evidence into practice, the embedded researcher model, where a researcher is embedded as a core member of the clinical team, offers promise. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare how the embedded researcher model has been adopted by different professional discipline groups in Australia. A purposive sample of current and former embedded researchers were invited to participate in an exploratory online survey. Responses were described using Excel and analysed using SPSS. Perspectives of 104 Australian embedded researchers were compared across three core professional disciplines; of nursing and midwifery (37), allied health (36), and medicine (27). Professional differences were reported in respondents' qualifications and experience, employment conditions and their research cultures and environments.Comparatively most medical, nursing and midwifery embedded researchers were older, more clinically experienced than allied health respondents, who were younger and more research qualified. As embedded researchers, most medical respondents prioritised conducting their own research while more nursing and midwifery and allied heath respondents reported complementing clinical research within their teams with a mix of research capacity building, management and clinical practice roles. Each professional discipline's experiences are likely influenced by their own profession's research histories and paradigms.