2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building reverse commute typologies through urban and suburban socioeconomic characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first identify reverse commute O-D pairs in Philadelphia that travel only within Pennsylvania counties of the Philadelphia metropolitan statistical area, using US Census Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data based on criteria described in previous work (Davidson, Feiglin, and Ryerson 2021;Davidson and Ryerson 2018). The analytic dataset contains 68,068 unique, reverse commute O-D observations when measured at the census tract level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first identify reverse commute O-D pairs in Philadelphia that travel only within Pennsylvania counties of the Philadelphia metropolitan statistical area, using US Census Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data based on criteria described in previous work (Davidson, Feiglin, and Ryerson 2021;Davidson and Ryerson 2018). The analytic dataset contains 68,068 unique, reverse commute O-D observations when measured at the census tract level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate this new coverage ratio and ranking approach, we build on previous work and look specifically at the case study of the reverse commuting population in Philadelphia (Davidson, Feiglin, and Ryerson 2021;Davidson and Ryerson 2018). This analysis of reverse commutes is one application of the proposed method that can be adjusted to different commute patterns and locations.…”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experience from French has indicate that majority suburban jobs has been taken by the workers from another suburbs (Aguiléra, 2005). While the motivation for doing reverse commuting could be explained by amenities-related factors (Aguiléra, Wenglenski and Proulhac, 2009), or socio economic disparity between home and work location (Davidson and Ryerson, 2018), the existence of cross-commuting pattern have not been well comprehended. While several 55 th ISOCARP World Planning Congress Jakarta-Bogor, Indonesia International Society of City and Regional Planners attempt has linked cross-commuting to household characteristics (Tscharaktschiew and Hirte, 2010), many were still presumed utility-maximization related factors as a major cause of the phenomenon (Berliant and Tabuchi, 2015;Viguié, 2015;Wrede, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%