2005
DOI: 10.1007/11427896_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Segmentation Based Human-Friendly Human Interaction Proofs (HIPs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By design, any system that breaks reCAPTCHA is a step towards better OCR software. 4 Our results indicate that Shape Contexts could be a valuable fallback solution in the domain of character recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By design, any system that breaks reCAPTCHA is a step towards better OCR software. 4 Our results indicate that Shape Contexts could be a valuable fallback solution in the domain of character recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is absolutely necessary for security because, as Chellapilla et al discuss in [5], recognizing single characters is a solved problem where computers even outperform humans. The task of segmentation on the other hand, where one is interested in partitioning a string in terms of a connected component into its individual characters, is still considered fairly resistant against automated attacks [4]. Shape Contexts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because any practical scheme necessitates that humans must be able to correctly solve the challenges with a high success rate, while at the same time the probability that a computer program can correctly solve it must be very small. It has been stated that the design of a robust CAPTCHA must somehow capitalize on the difference in ability between humans and current computer programs [5]. With advances in research areas like computer vision and machine learning, it is debatable whether or not it is possible to design a CAPTCHA that is easy for humans but difficult for computer programs, and as such this remains an open question.…”
Section: Design Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its use has been effective, to a certain extent, in deterring the automated abuse of online services intended for humans [5]. As examples, CAPTCHAs have been effective in preventing malicious bot programs from signing up for thousands of free email accounts and in deterring bots from sending out thousands of spam messages every minute [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specification-wise, CAPTCHA do not need to be 100% effective at identifying software bots. A design goal for a CAPTCHA could be to prevent bots from having a success rate greater than 0.01% [6]. Since CAPTCHA use increases the cost of a software robot, the CAPTCHA can still be effective, as long as this increased cost remains higher than the cost of using a human.…”
Section: Captchamentioning
confidence: 99%