2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2016.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building the case for a novel teleost model of non-breeding aggression and its neuroendocrine control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
35
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
7
35
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…the larger fish of the dyad always won the fight). In accordance with previous reports (Batista et al, 2012;Quintana et al, 2016), all the agonistic encounters also showed similar temporal profiles and followed the typical three phases: (1) a short pre-contest of 46.5±43 s; (2) the contest, characterized by highly aggressive displays by both contenders with a duration of 228.5±100 s; and (3) the 10 min post-contest phase, in which dominants, but not subordinates, persisted in attacking while subordinates attempted to flee and emitted submissive electric signals.…”
Section: Agonistic Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the larger fish of the dyad always won the fight). In accordance with previous reports (Batista et al, 2012;Quintana et al, 2016), all the agonistic encounters also showed similar temporal profiles and followed the typical three phases: (1) a short pre-contest of 46.5±43 s; (2) the contest, characterized by highly aggressive displays by both contenders with a duration of 228.5±100 s; and (3) the 10 min post-contest phase, in which dominants, but not subordinates, persisted in attacking while subordinates attempted to flee and emitted submissive electric signals.…”
Section: Agonistic Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The agonistic behavior of Gymnotus omarorum is the best understood example among teleosts of non-breeding territorial aggression (Batista et al, 2012;Jalabert et al, 2015;Quintana et al, 2016). In dyadic contests, the dominant fish defends its territory, while the subordinate fish interrupts its EOD to hide from the dominant one, emits bouts of chirps, and adopts a lower postresolution EOD basal rate than the dominant fish (Batista et al, 2012;Perrone and Silva, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with this, we have found that larger fish hold larger territories (Table 3). Body size is sexually monomorphic in this species and behavioral experiments have shown that agonistic behavior is non-sex-biased (22,39). In this study, we confirmed that non-breeding males and females hold sexually monomorphic territory sizes in the wild, probably to cope with energetic requirements that are not expected to be sexually different during winter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous laboratory results showed that this species presents a remarkably robust non-breeding territorial aggression (initially described in (22)), with well-characterized agonistic behavioral displays including modulations of the electric organ discharge (EOD) to signal submission (3537) and a dominant phenotype that persists for at least 36 hours (38). Under experimental laboratory conditions, male-male and female-female dyads that display non-breeding territorial behavior have shown no differences in either contest outcome, temporal dynamics of the agonistic encounter, levels of aggression, nor submissive signaling (39). Moreover, the only significant predictor of contest outcome is body size (22), and none of the features of agonistic encounters depends on circulating gonadal hormones (40).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%