2006
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2006.877518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building the Component Tree in Quasi-Linear Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
200
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
200
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative methods were presented in [49][50][51][52]. The recursive method discussed in [19] separates the construction of the tree from the computation of attributes and the actual filtering.…”
Section: The Max-tree Algorithm and The One-pass Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative methods were presented in [49][50][51][52]. The recursive method discussed in [19] separates the construction of the tree from the computation of attributes and the actual filtering.…”
Section: The Max-tree Algorithm and The One-pass Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set C ⋆ (F ), called the component tree of F [25,26], is a finite subset of C(F ) that is widely used in practice for image filtering.…”
Section: Edge-weighted Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are pushed in the queue (lines 10-11) and registered as representative if we reached a new level component (line 14). If q's gray-level i is higher than h, the flooding procedure is relaunched recursively to extract the subtree (lines [17][18][19]. Back from the neighbors, the attribute of the current h-level component is updated (line 21).…”
Section: Floodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be penalized by its dynamic allocation/deallocation scheme. The medical volume example suggests that the performance gap narrows when the number of gray levels increases, supposedly because of the dependance on L affecting both other algorithms [14,17]. To draw a definitive conclusion, one should adapt Wilkinson et al's union-find attribute opening to thinning operations.…”
Section: Computational Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%