Building the Legitimacy of Whistleblowers: A Multi‐Case Discourse Analysis

Abstract

Evidence suggests that society still does not view whistleblowers as wholly legitimate-despite legal protections now offered in some jurisdictions, such as the United States. Drawing on a discourse analysis (i.e., an examination of statements), we investigate the well-publicized stories of seven whistleblowers from 69 sources, including books, firstand second-hand interviews, websites, and videos. Our focus is to examine how whistleblower discourses can build legitimacy by more tightly defining the whistleblower role and demonstrating its alignment with social norms. Using whistleblower self-narratives, we identify four narrative patterns: (i) Trigger(s)-the event(s) leading to whistleblowing; (ii) Personality traits-whistleblower's morality, resourcefulness, and determination; (iii) Constraints-barriers requiring regulatory and organizational change; and (iv) Consequences-the longer term positive impact of the whistleblowing act. These patterns rely on symbolic, analogical, and metaphorical framing to allow others to better understand the role of whistleblowers and enlist their support. Exploring a data set of 1,621 press articles, we find indications that these narrative patterns resonate in the media-which provide a form of support and may be instrumental in legitimizing the whistleblower role. Grounded on these results, we develop a legitimacy construction model of the whistleblower role, that is, a representation of how role legitimacy is produced and sustained. From this model, we identify a number of important areas for future research.Construction de la légitimité des lanceurs d'alerte : une analyse de discours multi-cas RÉSUMÉ De nombreuses situations dans le domaine du public donnent à penser qu'il existe un scepticisme important à l'égard de la légitimité des lanceurs d'alertemalgré la protection juridique dont ils bénéficient maintenant dans certains pays, dont les États-Unis. A l'aide d'une analyse de discours

When the Client Is a Former Auditor: Auditees' Expert Knowledge and Social Capital as Threats to Staff Auditors' Operational Independence

“…Having the full set of first‐order terms, second‐order themes and overarching themes, we finally had the basis to build a complete data structure (see Figure ), which is “the pivotal step” in this approach (Gioia et al , 20; Stolowy et al ). Indeed, not only did the data structure “allo[w] us to configure our data into a sensible visual aid, it also provide[d] a graphic representation of how we progressed from raw data to terms and themes in conducting the analyses—a key component of demonstrating rigor in qualitative research” (Gioia et al , 20).…”

Deployment of whistleblowing as an accountability mechanism to curb corruption and fraud in a developing democracy

“…The construction and legitimization of whistleblowing as a socially acceptable fraud disclosure mechanism has gained prominence since the escalation in corporate malfeasance in the new century (Stolowy et al, 2019). Many countries have enacted or pledged to enact whistleblower legislation (Transparency International, 2013).…”

Whistleblowing Motivation and Gender: Vignette-Based Study in a Local Government

“…For example, the motivation to report misconduct can be highly affected by negative stereotypes of whistleblowers (Dasgupta & Kesharwani, 2010;Uys, 2008), as demonstrated through descriptive language such as "malcontents" (Bowman, 1980;Brewer & Selden, 1998) or "squealers" (Mesmer-Magnus & Viswesvaran, 2005). Whistleblowers are often perceived as "illegitimate" and disloyal by those within the workplace, despite the simultaneous attempts to support and encourage whistleblowing through increasing legal protections (Stolowy et al, 2019). This negative stereotype is reinforced by the perception that whistleblowing can result in "occupational suicide, or perhaps as accidental career death" (Perry, 1998, p. 241).…”