2006
DOI: 10.1080/01436590600850434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building the Tamil Eelam State: emerging state institutions and forms of governance in LTTE-controlled areas in Sri Lanka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand was the Sri Lankan state formation, which can be described as a consolidated electoral democracy, but is also characterised by majoritarianism within a unitary and centralised constitution and illiberal political practices that include ethnic constitution of demos, elitist incorporation of people and ethnic outbidding (de Votta 2004). On the other hand was the emerging state formation within LTTE-controlled areas, where LTTE has demonstrated an ability to govern but doing so by way of authoritarian centralisation with few mechanisms for democratic representation (Stokke 2006). This points to a dual need for political transformations towards rights-based democratisation, but this turned out to be too complicated and contentious to be handled in the peace process.…”
Section: Democratization In Sri Lankamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand was the Sri Lankan state formation, which can be described as a consolidated electoral democracy, but is also characterised by majoritarianism within a unitary and centralised constitution and illiberal political practices that include ethnic constitution of demos, elitist incorporation of people and ethnic outbidding (de Votta 2004). On the other hand was the emerging state formation within LTTE-controlled areas, where LTTE has demonstrated an ability to govern but doing so by way of authoritarian centralisation with few mechanisms for democratic representation (Stokke 2006). This points to a dual need for political transformations towards rights-based democratisation, but this turned out to be too complicated and contentious to be handled in the peace process.…”
Section: Democratization In Sri Lankamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ceasefi re Agreement on 22 February 2002 froze this military-territorial balance of power and segmented a de facto dual state structure (Shanmugaratnam 2008). In this context, the LTTE followed a strategy of institutionalising power sharing by building separate state institutions within the areas under their control and thereby producing a pretext for internal or external self-determination based on earned sovereignty (Stokke 2006(Stokke , 2007. In this sense, LTTE utilised the 'no war/no peace' situation created by the CFA to pursue their strategic interests, making the peace process an extension of war by other means.…”
Section: Political Transformation Of Lttementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anticipated peace dividend and international aid were also expected to deliver development and political legitimacy for the government within the Sinhalese majority. The LTTE followed a strategy of institutionalising power sharing by building separate state institutions within areas under its control and thereby produce a pretext for internal or external self-determination based on earned sovereignty (Nadarajah and Vimalarajah, 2008;Stokke, 2006Stokke, , 2007. In this sense, both protagonists used the 'no war/no peace' situation that was created by the ceasefire agreement to pursue their strategic interests, making the peace process an extension of war by other means.…”
Section: The Soft Power Of Facilitation and The Politics Of State Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, Western policing worked outside formal legal mechanisms, using the threat of legal action to pressure Tamil diaspora groups into eschewing separatism and the LTTE, and instead supporting the Sri Lankan government's devolution talks with Tamil political parties. 76 The stalling of Sri Lanka's military campaign and related expansion of the LTTE into a "de facto" state in areas under its control 77 necessitated a change in strategy. The result was the West-backed Norwegian peace initiative from 2000, centred on negotiations with the LTTE, rather than with "moderate" Tamil parties (which also united in endorsing the "extremist" LTTE as representing Tamils' interests in talks).…”
Section: Proscriptions During Sri Lanka's Warmentioning
confidence: 99%