"Buku Putih" Masa Pendudukan Jepang

Mulyatari, Dwi

doi:10.17510/wjhi.v2i1.277

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to other less popular literature, the suffering of the people during the Japanese domination of Indonesia was not only due to Japanese policies. Mulyatari (2000) explains the views of Shigeru Sato in his book War, Nationalism and Peasants: Java Under the Japanese Occupation which alludes to other factors of suffering such as the character and lifestyle of the people, the influence of Dutch-era colonialization and the effects of the raging global war. As for the rice policy, Sato revealed that the Pangreh Praja also put pressure on the people and that there was a reason for the sanyo (Japanese advisors from the natives) in the rice policy itself.…”

Section: Results and Discussion Rebellion In Defense Philosophymentioning

confidence: 99%

Defense Philosophy Perspectives on the Action of the Indonesian Defense Forces Army (PETA) in Blitar in Indonesian History Education Curriculum

Firdaus,

Sudarya,

Deksino

2023

Pertahanan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The action of the PETA Army in Blitar in the curriculum of history education in Indonesia is classified as a series of rebellion events. The usage of the phrase rebellion equates the PETA Army Action in Blitar with post-independence rebellion operations. Conceptually, this narrative raises the dilemmatic question of whether heroic actions can be considered acts of rebellion at the same time. From a defense science perspective, the discourse on acts of rebellion is classified as acts of insurgency. An act of rebellion is a criminal act that cannot be allowed. As a result, people are trapped in terms that have negative connotations in describing PETA's heroic struggle in Blitar. Therefore, this paper seeks to straighten out this perspective so that =narratives of history education can be in accordance with defense science. The method used in writing this research uses a descriptive qualitative research method with a literature study approach with a variety of literature on the philosophy of defense, philosophy of conflict, and philosophy of peace. The results show that rebellion against legitimate authorities can be categorized as a criminal act or social pathology and must be combated. Meanwhile, rebellion in the sense of revolution to achieve independence in the view of defense philosophy is an effort to achieve peace in the life and security of a nation. This kind of action is in accordance with defense objectives. Based on this, the actions taken by the PETA Army in Blitar were an independence movement to resist colonialism. This research encourages the adjustment of terms in the narrative of historical learning related to the actions of PETA soldiers in Blitar to be clearer, fairer, and more responsible

show abstract

Section: Results and Discussion Rebellion In Defense Philosophymentioning

confidence: 99%