2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulge mass is king: the dominant role of the bulge in determining the fraction of passive galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

54
334
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
54
334
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Those mass estimates are based on updated SDSS photometry and bulge+disc decomposition, using dual Sérsic profiles (Simard et al 2011). In their analysis, Bluck et al (2014) consider a subsample of the full catalogue defined by the cuts 0.02 < z < 0.2, 8 < log(Mstar) < 12, dDB < 1 and PpS < 0.5. dDB represents the scatter in the relation between the estimate of the total stellar mass and the sum of the estimates of bulge and disc separately; the applied cut removes objects with problematic decomposition. PpS is the probability that a source is best-fit by a single Sérsic profile; the applied cut removes sources with possibly spurious components.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those mass estimates are based on updated SDSS photometry and bulge+disc decomposition, using dual Sérsic profiles (Simard et al 2011). In their analysis, Bluck et al (2014) consider a subsample of the full catalogue defined by the cuts 0.02 < z < 0.2, 8 < log(Mstar) < 12, dDB < 1 and PpS < 0.5. dDB represents the scatter in the relation between the estimate of the total stellar mass and the sum of the estimates of bulge and disc separately; the applied cut removes objects with problematic decomposition. PpS is the probability that a source is best-fit by a single Sérsic profile; the applied cut removes sources with possibly spurious components.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bulge-to-total light/ mass ratio, B/T , or Sérsic index, nS (e.g., Driver et al 2006;Wuyts et al 2011;Mendel et al 2013;Bluck et al 2014;Lang et al 2014;Omand et al 2014). Additionally, the quenched fraction depends on environment, particularly the surface density of galaxies in a given region of space, the halo mass of the group or cluster, and the distance a galaxy resides at from the centre of its group (e.g., Balogh et al 2004;van den Bosch et al 2007Peng et al 2012;Woo et al 2013;Bluck et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become evident that understanding quenching processes in galaxies requires separate consideration of central and satellite galaxies, since the mechanisms for quenching star formation in these systems most likely differ (e.g., Peng et al 2012;Woo et al 2013;Bluck et al 2014;Knobel et al 2015). Central galaxies are most commonly defined as the most massive galaxy in their group or cluster, with satellites being any other group member (e.g., Yang et al 2007Yang et al , 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations