2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/716/2/942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BULGES OF NEARBY GALAXIES WITHSPITZER: SCALING RELATIONS IN PSEUDOBULGES AND CLASSICAL BULGES

Abstract: We investigate scaling relations of bulges using bulge-disk decompositions at 3.6 µm and present bulge classifications for 173 E-Sd galaxies within 20 Mpc. Pseudobulges and classical bulges are identified using Sérsic index, HST morphology, and star formation activity (traced by 8 µ emission). In the near-IR pseudobulges have n b < 2 and classical bulges have n b > 2, as found in the optical. Sérsic index and morphology are essentially equivalent properties for bulge classification purposes. We confirm, using … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
254
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
20
254
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…do classical bulges and elliptical galaxies. Fisher & Drory (2010) present a similar result. They see almost no dependence of effective surface brightness on effective radius.…”
Section: The Fundamental Planesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…do classical bulges and elliptical galaxies. Fisher & Drory (2010) present a similar result. They see almost no dependence of effective surface brightness on effective radius.…”
Section: The Fundamental Planesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…As the above evidence shows, most of our galaxies are likely to be pseudobulges. We therefore expect them to scale differently in the fundamental plane than in elliptical galaxies (Kormendy 1980;Carollo 1999;Kormendy & Kennicutt 2004;Fisher & Drory 2010). Specifically, we expect them to look more like disks.…”
Section: Bulge Morphologymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the effective radius is quite large, which can be explained by the extended X-structure in the central part of the galaxy. The moderate Sérsic index n ≈ 2.3 suggests that the bulge lies in the overlapping area between pseudo-bulges and classical bulges (Fisher & Drory 2010). However, low bulge flattening suggests that the central component may appear to be a classical bulge rather than a pseudo-bulge.…”
Section: Decomposition Of the Irac 36 µM Imagementioning
confidence: 98%
“…They are expected to have very different structural properties, because the bulges formed via secular evolutionary processes are expected to have more disk-like properties, while the so-called "classical" bulges are expected to have properties that are more related to elliptical galaxies (e.g. Athanassoula 2005;Fisher & Drory 2008;Gadotti 2009;Fisher & Drory 2010, for a detail discussion on the properties on both types of bulges, see the review by Based on observations obtained at Siding Spring Observatory (RSAA, ANU, Australia) and the INT telescope at the ING, La Palma, Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%