2016
DOI: 10.1364/oe.24.023198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulk AlInAs on InP(111) as a novel material system for pure single photon emission

Abstract: Unsleber, S.; Deppisch, M.; Krammel, C.M.; Vo, Minh; Yerino, C.D.; Simmonds, P.G.; Lee, Minjoo Larry; Koenraad, P.M.; Schneider, C.; Höfling, S. Published in: Optics Express DOI:10.1364/OE.24.023198Published: 03/10/2016 Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication:• A submitted manuscript is the author's version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the secondary peak, we obtain E 1 = 46 meV and E 2 = 13 meV. For the primary peak, values of E 1 = 24 meV and E 2 = 9 meV rule out In-rich InAlAs nanoclusters as the cause, since we have previously measured activation energies of E 1 = 34 meV and E 2 = 5 meV for these QD-like features 33 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the secondary peak, we obtain E 1 = 46 meV and E 2 = 13 meV. For the primary peak, values of E 1 = 24 meV and E 2 = 9 meV rule out In-rich InAlAs nanoclusters as the cause, since we have previously measured activation energies of E 1 = 34 meV and E 2 = 5 meV for these QD-like features 33 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Given this unexpected result, we must exclude alternative causes of the primary PL peak. Possible origins include TSQD excited-state emission 32 , emission from phase-separated In-rich nanoclusters in the InAlAs 33 , or emission from a family of smaller GaAs TSQDs due to a bimodal size distribution 19 . The primary peak persists even for PL excitation densities as low as 0.3 W/cm 2 , which precludes excited state emission as the cause [see Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is why QWIPs always need an extra diffraction grating (or any other equivalent mechanism) on top of the devices to operate properly in normal incidence. As a result, the strong signal measured in our SML-QDIPsthese devices have among the highest detectivity values reported to date [17,31]can only be due to the 3D confinement of carriers inside the In-rich clusters observed in the X-STM images, and the blueshift of the spectral response must be related to the size variation of these clusters that behave as quantum dots [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In the case of InGaAs/GaAs QWs, there are fluctuations of the In composition that acts as localization potentials for electrons and holes [14]. Similar effects of QD-like emission from In-rich regions have also been observed in InAlAs/InP (see, for example [15]). Compositional and thickness fluctuations are much more enhanced in case of quaternary or quinary QWs, e.g., InGaAsN(Sb).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%