IEE Colloquium on EMC Testing for Conducted Mechanisms 1996
DOI: 10.1049/ic:19960729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulk current injection (BCI): its past, present and future(?) in aerospace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These benefits summarily include [16][17][18], [32] : 1 better correlation to free field irradiation in terms of surface and loom current distribution; 2 a more efficient transfer of energy into the rig resulting in lower power requirements; reduced radiation losses, giving a reduced radiation hazard and less RF pollution. However, the use of In validating the DCI technique [13][14][15][16][17][18], [28][29][30][31][32] , the most useful verification process is to make detailed comparisons with accepted test techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . The parameters such as airframe surface currents, wiring loom currents, power requirements, frequency [1][2][3][4][5], [13][14][15][16][17][18], [20][21][22], [32][33] have carried out a lot of research into this technology, including ineti (DERA, its predecessor organization) and BAe in UK, DSTO in Australia, EMCCons and EADS in Germany.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Two Test Rig Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These benefits summarily include [16][17][18], [32] : 1 better correlation to free field irradiation in terms of surface and loom current distribution; 2 a more efficient transfer of energy into the rig resulting in lower power requirements; reduced radiation losses, giving a reduced radiation hazard and less RF pollution. However, the use of In validating the DCI technique [13][14][15][16][17][18], [28][29][30][31][32] , the most useful verification process is to make detailed comparisons with accepted test techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . The parameters such as airframe surface currents, wiring loom currents, power requirements, frequency [1][2][3][4][5], [13][14][15][16][17][18], [20][21][22], [32][33] have carried out a lot of research into this technology, including ineti (DERA, its predecessor organization) and BAe in UK, DSTO in Australia, EMCCons and EADS in Germany.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Two Test Rig Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the raising level of EM environment and EMC safety margin for aircraft systems, high test costs coupled with the complexity of new systems made HIRF and BCI method become less acceptable in their current forms. Even the original developers of BCI had made the point that the use of BCI on modern aircraft would become increasingly difficult [1][2][3][4][5], [21] . Consequently, direct current injection (DCI) technique was introduced [15] as an alternative procedure for conducting high level EM clearance test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, the interference current is injected into the cable of the equipment to substitute for radiation susceptibility test [1,2]. As a kind of complementary method, the core of the BCI research is how to keep the equivalence with the radiation test method in broader application range and higher precision [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk current injection (BCI) is a widely used technique for electromagnetic compatibility testing [1][2][3]. A good deal of excellent work has been published concerning the modeling of BCI probes [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%