2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulk moduli and seismic attenuation in partially saturated rocks: hysteresis of liquid bridges effect

Abstract: A B S T R A C TA key task of exploration geophysics is to find relationships between seismic attributes (velocities and attenuation) and fluid properties (saturation and pore pressure). Experimental data suggest that at least three different factors affect these relationships, which are not well explained by classical Gassmann, Biot, squirt-flow, mesoscopicflow and gas dissolution/exsolution models. Some of these additional factors include (i) effect of wettability and surface tension between immiscible fluids… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our model, this effect is highly sensitive to the wettability of the rock. Effects of wettability on seismic wave velocities were observed more than 60 years ago, after Wyllie et al (), who were the first (to our knowledge) to report this effect (see also Waite et al, ; Wang et al, ; Rozhko, , ); however, the wettability effects are not mentioned in the literature review by Kazantsev (). If the rock is mixed wet (when contact angles are close to 90°), then equation would predict very high value of the critical wave amplitude ( ∆σ c ), required for the contact line slippage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our model, this effect is highly sensitive to the wettability of the rock. Effects of wettability on seismic wave velocities were observed more than 60 years ago, after Wyllie et al (), who were the first (to our knowledge) to report this effect (see also Waite et al, ; Wang et al, ; Rozhko, , ); however, the wettability effects are not mentioned in the literature review by Kazantsev (). If the rock is mixed wet (when contact angles are close to 90°), then equation would predict very high value of the critical wave amplitude ( ∆σ c ), required for the contact line slippage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this paper we extend both approaches of Gassmann () and Rozhko (, ) by coupling of the interfacial energy to Gassmann's theory. Interfacial energy effects on seismic wave velocity dispersion have been reported in many publications (Knight et al, ; Knight & Nolen‐Hoeksema, ; Moerig et al, ; Murphy, ; Murphy et al, ; Papageorgiou et al, ; Rozhko & Bauer, ; Vo‐Thanh, ; Waite et al, ; Wang et al, ; Wyllie et al, ); see Rozhko () for detailed literature review. The coupling is done by three extra parameters, which can be obtained from standard laboratory tests: pore‐size distribution and interfacial tension between immiscible fluids and rock wettability (advancing and receding contact angles).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because the initial far‐field normal stress, the initial fluid pressure and initial contact angles are identical in two identical cracks, the initial saturation degree is also identical in two cracks. Rozhko (), Rozhko and Bauer () and Rozhko () derived equations, describing the initial equilibrium saturation and the capillary pressure of partially saturated crack. The capillary pressure inside the equilibrium crack is calculated as follows (Rozhko ): truerightpnormalcap=leftπ4()pcl+σn+pweleft×0.28em118pclγcos()θπbβ+cotβlncosβπ/2pcl+σn+pwe2sin()ββ+cot()βln[]cos()βπ/2,where pcl is the crack closure pressure, calculated as (Rozhko ): pcl=bμa1v,where μ and v are the Shear modulus and Poisson's ratio of the rock mineral.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the volume of the wetting fluid phase inside the partially saturated crack (Vwe) is calculated as (Rozhko and Bauer ; Rozhko ): Vwe=true-0.16em-0.16emVwe+δVwewhere truerightVweπab=left1+σn+pwe+pnormalcap1+4πβsin()2ββ2+2cos2()βln[]cos()β2βsin()2βpclleft×0.28em2βsin2βπ.And truerightδVweb2=leftπ2θsin2θcos2()θsin2()βleft×0.28em1+σn+pwe+π2β2cot()βln[]cos()βπpnormalcappcl2.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation