Bulk phase separation study by atomic force microscope friction imaging of natural rubber/poly(methyl methacrylate) film

Thonggoom, Rattaporn; Thamasirianunt, P.; Sanguansap, Kittiporn; Tangboriboonrat, Pramuan

doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.12.008

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Experimental Procedures and Results1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2012

2014

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, such an approach is much more reliable than in the case of the single profilebased roughness determination. The profiles, however, despite visible drawbacks, are still used in the roughness calculation [36,37].…”

Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improvement of the scanning area positioning repeatability using nanomarkers developed with a nanoscratching method

Sikora

2014

Meas. Sci. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A sophisticated experiment requiring multiple micrometer-scale scanning of the same area of a sample may be performed easily if special positioning features on the surface are available. A set of nanomarkers developed using a nanoscratching technique can provide an efficient, submicron-accurate solution allowing us to investigate various phenomena. In this paper, the analysis of the roughness estimation repeatability is presented in terms of defining the accuracy of the area of interest. The obtained results confirmed the possibility of the repeatable positioning of the sample in an atomic force microscope, providing area roughness determination repeatability with a standard distribution smaller than 3%. As an example, the observation of light-caused surface degradation is presented. Also, the utilization of nanomarkers in determining the magnetic domain's rearrangement angle with an accuracy better than 0.5° is shown.

show abstract

Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%