2015
DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2014.988698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bulldozers, homes and highways: Nairobi and the right to the city

Abstract: In Kenya road building, widely viewed as an ‘unqualified human good’, is closely linked to an ‘Africa Rising’ narrative. In this paper the author argues that road building is an attempt to assert political authority derived from a longstanding developmentalist impulse, one in which private accumulation and spectacular public works go hand in hand. In light of massive infrastructural transformations, the author develops a conceptualisation of the right to the city: what is needed is a radical understanding of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two dominant areas of infrastructure disruption that emerged were mobility constraints and unreliable water supply—perhaps not the first concerns one might expect in the ‘creative city’:
you're not just like walking on the street and like dipping into a coffee shop or walking down the street and ‘oh I'm going to go shopping there’. It's like you have to plan and I'm going to there , and that's where I'm going to get in my taxi and then go there (Dale).
Mobility infrastructure within African cities is a highly important feature of place; it is the point at which the private car—a quintessential signifier of modernity in developing countries—and the colonially configured road space converge (Robinson, 2006; Graham and Thrift, 2007; Pieterse, 2008; Manji, 2015). In Nairobi, this manifests itself in the colossal traffic jams, its potholed roads and the heavy air pollution.…”
Section: Infrastructure Disruption In ‘Silicon Savannah’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two dominant areas of infrastructure disruption that emerged were mobility constraints and unreliable water supply—perhaps not the first concerns one might expect in the ‘creative city’:
you're not just like walking on the street and like dipping into a coffee shop or walking down the street and ‘oh I'm going to go shopping there’. It's like you have to plan and I'm going to there , and that's where I'm going to get in my taxi and then go there (Dale).
Mobility infrastructure within African cities is a highly important feature of place; it is the point at which the private car—a quintessential signifier of modernity in developing countries—and the colonially configured road space converge (Robinson, 2006; Graham and Thrift, 2007; Pieterse, 2008; Manji, 2015). In Nairobi, this manifests itself in the colossal traffic jams, its potholed roads and the heavy air pollution.…”
Section: Infrastructure Disruption In ‘Silicon Savannah’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It engaged with these diverse actors throughout the mapping process to get feedback and build an understanding of the data and its standardised format (General Transit Feed Specification) as well as to encourage use of the data to influence policy and planning. The project was motivated by a desire to raise the profile of public transport in Kenya where a strong focus on highway building for cars was under way without regard for the majority of people who use matatus as the main form of motorised transport (Klopp, 2012;Manji, 2015). Thus, mapping was part of a specific prourban public transport advocacy agenda, influenced by a growing global civic hacker movement aimed at improving passenger interaction with public transport by providing high quality information through apps and maps (Townsend 2013;McHugh, 2013).…”
Section: Mapping Matatus In Nairobimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the project delays illustrate, this role is not a simple one: the state seems unable to steer process outcomes in such a complex project . The reasons for the inability of the Kenyan state (so far) to develop the project, in spite of high-level support including the presidency, can be found in the fragmented nature of planning in Kenya and contradictory interests within the Kenyan state (Manji, 2015). While the MIC was deeply involved in advancing its vision for the project and committed to starting construction fast, its expertise is in ICT and not in urban planning or land development.…”
Section: Buff Er Zone Repulsion and Att Raction: Displacement Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%