2009
DOI: 10.1080/01425690802514391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bullies, bullying and power in the contexts of schooling

Abstract: In this paper the four authors explore the experience of school bullying, drawing on stories of bullying generated in a collective biography workshop and on fictional accounts of bullying. They counter the current trend of reading bullying as individual or family pathology with a post-structuralist analysis of subjectification and power.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…as Bansel et al (2009) show, bullies are often readmitted to this community once they have shown the requisite remorse.…”
Section: Narrative and Conflict: Explorations In Theory Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as Bansel et al (2009) show, bullies are often readmitted to this community once they have shown the requisite remorse.…”
Section: Narrative and Conflict: Explorations In Theory Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of disadvantages are that the strategy takes for granted that certain norms and structural patterns have the same effect on everyone, which research has shown is not the case. Human life is too complex and dynamic to be captured with concepts such as hegemony and ideology (see also Bansel, Davies, Laws & Linnell, 2009;Ekerwald & Säfström, 2012;Kumashiro, 2001;Walkerdine, 1989). Finally, it is also taken for granted that a critical awareness about the production and reproduction of norms and values automatically generates responses to Others that secure their needs and do not harm them.…”
Section: Four Strategies To Handle the Other In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Bronwyn Davies and her colleagues (Bansel, Davies, Laws, & Linnell, 2009;Davies, 2011;Ellwood & Davies, 2010; see also Winslade, 2013) have argued against the pathologizing of those who bully as having some kind of moral deficit and instead suggest that they are better understood as policing social norms and solidifying identity categories that fit with these norms.…”
Section: Principles Of the Undercover Team Approach -mentioning
confidence: 99%