1989
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb11330.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bumble Bee Pollination and Floral Morphology: Factors Influencing Pollen Dispersal in the Alpine Sky Pilot, Polemonium Viscosum (Polemoniaceae)

Abstract: Pollen dispersal success in entomophilous plants is influenced by the amount of pollen produced per flower, the fraction of pollen that is exported to other flowers during a pollinator visit, visitation frequency, and the complementarity between pollen donor and recipients. For bumble bee-pollinated Polemonium viscosum the first three determinants of male function are correlated with morphometric floral traits. Pollen production is positively related to corolla and style length, whereas pollen removal per visi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
121
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
121
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Acredita-se que as estruturas morfolĂłgicas maiores no morfo brevistilo Ă© uma maneira de compensar uma possĂ­vel assimetria no fl uxo de pĂłlen em sua direção, devido a disposição estrutural do morfo longistilo facilitar a polinização (Ganders 1979). Realmente, alguns trabalhos tĂȘm demonstrado que o "display" fl oral exerce uma função importante em sistemas reprodutivos intermediado por animais, contudo estudos direcionados para espĂ©cies distĂ­licas seriam necessĂĄrios para constatar atĂ© que ponto estruturas morfolĂłgicas maiores entre os morfos infl uenciam na atração do polinizador (Galen & Stanton 1989, Mal & Lovett-Doust 1997. AlĂ©m disso, outros estudos mostram que nem sempre essa diferença existe ou ocorre nesse sentido (Stone 1995, Teixeira & Machado 2004, Coelho & Barbosa 2004, Pereira et al 2006.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Acredita-se que as estruturas morfolĂłgicas maiores no morfo brevistilo Ă© uma maneira de compensar uma possĂ­vel assimetria no fl uxo de pĂłlen em sua direção, devido a disposição estrutural do morfo longistilo facilitar a polinização (Ganders 1979). Realmente, alguns trabalhos tĂȘm demonstrado que o "display" fl oral exerce uma função importante em sistemas reprodutivos intermediado por animais, contudo estudos direcionados para espĂ©cies distĂ­licas seriam necessĂĄrios para constatar atĂ© que ponto estruturas morfolĂłgicas maiores entre os morfos infl uenciam na atração do polinizador (Galen & Stanton 1989, Mal & Lovett-Doust 1997. AlĂ©m disso, outros estudos mostram que nem sempre essa diferença existe ou ocorre nesse sentido (Stone 1995, Teixeira & Machado 2004, Coelho & Barbosa 2004, Pereira et al 2006.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Despite a long history of interest in the diverse pollination mechanisms and reproductive biology of the family (e.g. Grant & Grant, 1965;Levin, 1972;Schoen, 1982;Galen & Stanton, 1989;Campbell et al, 1991), and despite the prevalence of SI in the Polemoniaceae [found in at least eight of the 18 genera (Grant & Grant, 1965)1, the genetic basis of SI has been studied in only a single species, Phlox drummondii (Levin, Experimental crosses among full-siblings have been used extensively for elucidating the genetic basis of SI. Expectations for incompatibility relationships among full-siblings (assuming that parents are heterozygotes and share no S-alleles) differ for GSI and SSI in several respects (Richards, 1986).…”
Section: U Ct Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences may be manifest in their effect on reproductive success either through female or through male function (Lloyd and Yates 1982, Bell 1985, Campbell 1989, Snow 1989. A number of recent studies have measured pollen removal as a component of male function (Snow and Roubik 1987, Cruzan et al 1988, Galen and Stanton 1989, Harder and Thomson 1989, Wolfe and Barrett 1989, Harder 1990, Murcia 1990, Young and Stanton 1990; however, high pollen removal need not result in high subsequent deposition of the removed pollen or in high success at siring seeds. Here we provide an example in which pollen-collecting bees remove more pollen but deposit less of it than nectar-collecting bees.…”
Section: Manuscript Receivedmentioning
confidence: 99%