2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bundle geometry design influence on fuel burnup and performances in a CANDU reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PHWR fuel differs from more common Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel in that individual fuel assemblies (bundles) are substantially smaller in physical size and weight [24], and LWR fuel is typically enriched in 235 U to compensate for neutron leakage in the light water moderator. The use of natural uranium in PHWR fuel coupled with the burn-up/on-line refuelling of such reactors allows for the breeding of 239 Pu in concentrations of approximately 2.6 g/kg of initial natural uranium [25].…”
Section: Phwr Fuel Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHWR fuel differs from more common Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel in that individual fuel assemblies (bundles) are substantially smaller in physical size and weight [24], and LWR fuel is typically enriched in 235 U to compensate for neutron leakage in the light water moderator. The use of natural uranium in PHWR fuel coupled with the burn-up/on-line refuelling of such reactors allows for the breeding of 239 Pu in concentrations of approximately 2.6 g/kg of initial natural uranium [25].…”
Section: Phwr Fuel Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%