REPLY
Epidural buprenorphineTo the Editor: Ackerman et al., 1 from the University of Cincinnati, Ohio, report a well-conducted study of pruritus associated with epidural opiates. The drugs studied were 5 mg morphine, 50 ttg fentanyl, 0.3 mg buprenorphine, or 1 mg butorphanol in 10 ml. Two concerns emerge about the use of buprenorphine by this route of administration: (i) the absence of approval by the appropriate regulatory authorities, and (ii) whether this route of administration leads to any pharmacokinetic or pharrnacodynamic advantage.As a pharmaceutical physician at Norwich Eaton, the company responsible for Buprenex | in the USA, I am obliged to point out that this is not an approved route of administration for buprenorphine in this country. While the parenteral formulation may be attractive for epidural studies because it contains no organic preservatives, the anaesthetist should be informed that he or she uses this route of administration with the risks which attend unapproved usage.Buprenorphine is a highly lipophilic, potent and parenterally long-acting analgesic, 2'3 and is an exception to the general rule that epidural doses of opioids are smaller than parenteral doses. Compare, for example, equianalgesic doses of buprenorphine and morphine by the two routes of administration. A standard parenteral dose of buprenorphine is 0.3 mg. Lanz et al. 2 directly compared epidural doses of 0.3 mg and 0.15 mg buprenorphine, and showed that the former gave better analgesia; these data suggest that the parenteral/epidural (P/E) analgesic dose ratio for buprenorphine equals I. This P/E ratio is confirmed by other, less rigorous, single epidural dose studies. ,.4-sThe low P/E dose ratio, and the similarity of duration of action by the epidural and parenteral routes, suggest that there is no advantage to be gained by the administration of buprenorphine using the epidural route. Furthermore, these data are consistent with an analgesic effect which may be entirely due to systemic absorption. The profile of adverse effects dependent upon this route of administration is relatively unknown.6 In the absence of any pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic advantage, the epidural route of administration must be considered to be redundant for buprenorphine.