2012
DOI: 10.2174/1874473711205010052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buprenorphine-Mediated Transition from Opioid Agonist to Antagonist Treatment: State of the Art and New Perspectives

Abstract: Constant refinement of opioid dependence (OD) therapies is a condition to promote treatment access and delivery. Among other applications, the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine has been studied to improve evidence-based interventions for the transfer of patients from opioid agonist to antagonist medications. This paper summarizes PubMed-searched clinical investigations and conference papers on the transition from methadone maintenance to buprenorphine and from buprenorphine to naltrexone, discussing challen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(137 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is based on moderately high treatment retention, decrease in withdrawal scores, low proportion of adverse events, and high degree of patient satisfaction. If replicated in other clinical samples, a XR-NTX transfer rate of 60–70% with a 30-day proportion of 80% negative opioid urine tests would compare well against results of induction and early retention onto oral NTX (10%–40%), (Mannelli et al, 2012; Tucker et al, 2004), or buprenorphine and methadone (Kakko et al, 2007; Mannelli et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion is based on moderately high treatment retention, decrease in withdrawal scores, low proportion of adverse events, and high degree of patient satisfaction. If replicated in other clinical samples, a XR-NTX transfer rate of 60–70% with a 30-day proportion of 80% negative opioid urine tests would compare well against results of induction and early retention onto oral NTX (10%–40%), (Mannelli et al, 2012; Tucker et al, 2004), or buprenorphine and methadone (Kakko et al, 2007; Mannelli et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The range of doses was based on experience using it on inpatient units with patients tapering off methadone (Mannelli et al, 2003, 2009) or buprenorphine (Eissenberg et al, 1996; Johnson, 2001; Kosten et al, 1990; Umbricht et al, 1999). The BUP dose reduction schedule was based on available literature (Mannelli et al, 2012); dosing schedules are seen in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should now ask how we can best tailor established treatments to suit the needs of individuals in difference circumstances . Questions remain regarding comparisons between treatments, combinations of treatments and optimal treatment regimens . Much attention has been given to approved treatments such as methadone tapering for opioid dependence and benzodiazepines for alcohol dependence, and more research is required into emerging treatment possibilities, such as oxytocin and flumazenil .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stepped care strategy involving initial treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone and transition to methadone if necessary was shown to be equally efficacious as an optimally delivered methadone treatment. 56 In contrast, although transitioning to buprenorphine-naloxone from methadone is achievable, 57 this practice must be individually tailored and can be highly challenging for some patients. 58 Indeed, when transitioning from higher daily doses of methadone, there is an increased risk of substantial withdrawal symptoms and consequent relapse; adjunct medications or inpatient treatment (e.g., medically supervised withdrawal management programs) may be required for safe conversion in such cases.…”
Section: Treatment Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%