2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-023-03255-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burden with No Benefit: Prior Authorization in Congenital Cardiology

Brian S. Marcus,
Neha Bansal,
Joshua Saef
et al.

Abstract: Prior authorization is a process that health insurance companies use to determine if a patient’s health insurance will cover certain medical treatments, procedures, or medications. Prior authorization requests are common in adult congenital and pediatric cardiology (ACPC) due to need for advanced diagnostics, complex procedures, disease-specific medications, and the heterogeneity of the ACPC population. Prior authorizations in ACPC are rarely denied, but nonetheless, they are often accompanied by significant a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Patients' physicians are permitted to appeal coverage denials through avenues the insurer stipulates, and which usually involve telephone conversations with insurer designees ("peer-to-peer" discussions) and formal appeal letters. Insurers assert that this practice adjudicates the best use of medical resources and protect patients from unnecessary medical interventions, but physicians across a spectrum of medical specialties argue that these practices delay patient care, 3,4 discriminate, 5,6 deter enrollment to and confound interpretation of clinical trials, 7,8 and burden physicians [9][10][11][12] with unnecessary clerical work and costs. 13 Cancer patients -whose lives might depend on multidisciplinary systemic, surgical, and radiotherapeutic treatments -are too familiar with insurer delays and denials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Patients' physicians are permitted to appeal coverage denials through avenues the insurer stipulates, and which usually involve telephone conversations with insurer designees ("peer-to-peer" discussions) and formal appeal letters. Insurers assert that this practice adjudicates the best use of medical resources and protect patients from unnecessary medical interventions, but physicians across a spectrum of medical specialties argue that these practices delay patient care, 3,4 discriminate, 5,6 deter enrollment to and confound interpretation of clinical trials, 7,8 and burden physicians [9][10][11][12] with unnecessary clerical work and costs. 13 Cancer patients -whose lives might depend on multidisciplinary systemic, surgical, and radiotherapeutic treatments -are too familiar with insurer delays and denials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%