2017
DOI: 10.1111/plar.12203
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bureaucratic Speech: Language Choice and Democratic Identity in the Taipei Bureaucracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The event is an informal bureaucratic setting: there will be no sanctions or reper cussions for the witnesses if they do not comply with the bureaucratic force behind the event, as opposed to what contending with the structural violence of Israel's permit regime entails (Berda 2017). Interpersonal dynamics occur in bureaucratic state settings as well, offering bureaucracy agents creative leeway in their interactions (Bernstein 2017). A curious element in the event is how this creativity is utilized by the nonbureaucratic actors, and how it indexes and poignantly critiques both the omnipresentyetabsent state bureaucracy, and the very much present bureaucracy of HR.…”
Section: Re-calibrating Time In the Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The event is an informal bureaucratic setting: there will be no sanctions or reper cussions for the witnesses if they do not comply with the bureaucratic force behind the event, as opposed to what contending with the structural violence of Israel's permit regime entails (Berda 2017). Interpersonal dynamics occur in bureaucratic state settings as well, offering bureaucracy agents creative leeway in their interactions (Bernstein 2017). A curious element in the event is how this creativity is utilized by the nonbureaucratic actors, and how it indexes and poignantly critiques both the omnipresentyetabsent state bureaucracy, and the very much present bureaucracy of HR.…”
Section: Re-calibrating Time In the Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is what I call stateless agency : a form of collectivized democratic authority that relies on the erasure of bureaucratic and elected state actors in order to maintain its legitimacy. My analysis thus contributes to work on bureaucracy, the developmental state, and governance by analyzing how processes of collectivization and erasure inhere in bureaucratic and democratic speech (Hull 2010; Bernstein 2017), looking beyond the production and circulation of documents in government offices to understand how a range of social actors co‐produce bureaucratic logics of collectivization and erasure in interaction.…”
Section: Bureaucracy Collectivization Erasurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the meeting “form” has been examined for its formal logics, rules, and capacity to generate (rather than solve) problems (Schwartzman 1987; 1989), this study aims to deepen our understanding of the “technologies of talk” (Gal, Kowalski, and Moore 2015, 611) that enable the emergence of a collectivized democratic will in the meetings underpinning panchayat governance. By integrating analysis of the ethnographic specificities of meetings, alongside the technologies of speech that emerge within them, we can better trace the semiotic logics that engender and sustain developmental projects around the world (Hull 2010; Bernstein 2017; Kockelman 2016).…”
Section: Bureaucracy Collectivization Erasurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variety of democratic configurations is in most cases not the result of incomplete or insincere efforts to engage democratic ideals. Rather, it highlights the socially embedded and emergent character of “actually existing democracies” (Bernstein , 29). That is, the politics that are articulated by these diverse renditions of democracy reflect how democratic discourses and political practices are engaged by people in a given context, and the manner in which these engagements are conditioned by and mediated through social and semiotic processes particular to that context (Bernstein ; Coles ; Hull ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, it highlights the socially embedded and emergent character of “actually existing democracies” (Bernstein , 29). That is, the politics that are articulated by these diverse renditions of democracy reflect how democratic discourses and political practices are engaged by people in a given context, and the manner in which these engagements are conditioned by and mediated through social and semiotic processes particular to that context (Bernstein ; Coles ; Hull ). Investigating how democracy and democratic politics are articulated in context, then, demands close attention to the minutiae of political practice, that is, the specific ways that individuals engage democracy's signature forms (its discourses and its technologies), how these engagements are positioned in relationship to existing conceptions of democratic politics, and how they are informed and conditioned by context‐specific political projects and histories, values, and communicative practices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%