2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.07.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burn control simulation experiments in JT-60U

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the burn controllability was not lost even with P ex = 0, these results indicated that the control margin was smaller with a higher fusion gain. In addition, oscillation of P ex for keeping the stored energy constant was larger in the RS plasma than that in the ELMy H-mode plasma [2]. The analysis using the 1.5 dimension transport code TOPICS [3] indicated that the larger oscillation of P ex experimentally observed in the RS plasma cannot be explained by the difference in the thermal diffusivity profiles or temperature dependence of the thermal diffusivities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the burn controllability was not lost even with P ex = 0, these results indicated that the control margin was smaller with a higher fusion gain. In addition, oscillation of P ex for keeping the stored energy constant was larger in the RS plasma than that in the ELMy H-mode plasma [2]. The analysis using the 1.5 dimension transport code TOPICS [3] indicated that the larger oscillation of P ex experimentally observed in the RS plasma cannot be explained by the difference in the thermal diffusivity profiles or temperature dependence of the thermal diffusivities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, considerations of various physics among the strong linkages are limited in the present simulation model. In JT-60U, a burning plasma simulation scheme has been developed [1,2], in order to experimentally introduce in DD non-burning plasmas the linkage between pressure and heating profiles similar to alpha particle heating. In the scheme used in [1,2], the neutral beam (NB) heating power proportional to the DD neutron yield rate was applied as P α = G × S n using a real-time control system for the simulation of alpha particle heating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar analyses are done in some researchers; e.g., the current drive simulation with the measurement of current profile peaking factor [4], the current drive and control simulation in ITER [5,6], the density profile control analysis in ASDEX [7]. The plasma burn control simulation is done in JT-60U [8][9][10] and in Ref [11]. In most of these researches, they control one parameter with one actuator for moderate performance plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the latter half of this section, we show an example for which control using the trained NN outperforms the fixedgain PID controller. We introduce additional NB injection that is proportional to the neutron yield rate, which simulates the effect of alpha heating as seen in the burning plasma simulation experiments in JT-60U [15][16][17]. In this case, the non-linearity of the ΔT i response to the injected NB power used for control (excluding the NB power used to simulate alpha heating) becomes much stronger, especially for models with high confinement quality, and control with one fixed gain is thought to be more difficult.…”
Section: Validation Of the Control System For Jt-60u Plasmas Of Jt-60umentioning
confidence: 99%