2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2017.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burning a graph is hard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The burning number of a given graph is the minimum such number; hence, an optimal algorithm burns the graph in a number of rounds that is equal to the burning number. Unfortunately, finding optimal solutions is NP-hard even for elementary graph families [2]. The focus of this paper is to provide approximation algorithms for burning graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The burning number of a given graph is the minimum such number; hence, an optimal algorithm burns the graph in a number of rounds that is equal to the burning number. Unfortunately, finding optimal solutions is NP-hard even for elementary graph families [2]. The focus of this paper is to provide approximation algorithms for burning graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formal definition of this problem was provided in the framework of graph theory by Anthony Bonato et al [1]. It was proved that computing a "burning number" is NP-complete [2]. The problem was further studied in papers [3,4], where the bounds for the burning number (i.e., the minimum number of time steps, equal to the minimum size of the set of nodes, which are informed or alarmed "from the outside", not from their neighbor) are analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we settle the burning number conjecture for the class of spider graphs, which are trees with exactly one vertex of degree strictly greater than two; see Theorem 7. While spiders might initially appear to be an elementary graph class in the context of graph burning, it was shown in [2] that computing the burning number on spiders is NP-complete. The main ingredient in our proof of the conjecture for spiders relies on new bounds on the burning number of path-forests (that is, disjoint unions of paths); see Lemmas 2 and 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bounds provided in our results improve on the known bound given in [3] of b(G) ≤ ⌈n 1/2 ⌉ + t − 1, where G is a path-forest of order n with t components. As shown in [2], the problem of computing the burning number of path-forests is also NP-complete. Our bounds provide a All graphs we consider are simple, finite, and undirected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%