In Russian practice, there are examples of negative experiences with collective housing, such as communal apartments. However, given certain conditions and factors, collective housing can motivate creation and inspire experiments. The article examines three types of collective housing, varying in length of stay, presence or absence of common goals and values, voluntary or forced participation, size of personal space, and various financial capabilities. Communal apartments, corridor and block-type dormitories, and the organization of short-term festivals are considered as examples. A matrix of evaluation criteria has been formed for each type.