1982
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(82)90086-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burning times of linear fuel droplet arrays: A comparison of experiment and theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the single/multiple droplets combustion is considered as a basic unit of the spray combustion, a number of articles have been published so far on this subject [ex. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Theoretical works of the single droplet combustion have been progressed by taking advantage of its symmetric nature.…”
Section: Impact Of Microgravity Environment For Studies On Droplet Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the single/multiple droplets combustion is considered as a basic unit of the spray combustion, a number of articles have been published so far on this subject [ex. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Theoretical works of the single droplet combustion have been progressed by taking advantage of its symmetric nature.…”
Section: Impact Of Microgravity Environment For Studies On Droplet Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early theoretical works on the interaction have been found in 60's, successfully showing that the flame-flame interaction could modify not only the flame shape but also the combustion characteristics (e.g., life time of droplets) [5][6][7]. To validate these theories, a series of corresponding experiment of single/multiple droplet(s) combustion have been performed, but the most of successful ones were done after 80's [8][9][10]; nearly two-decades later. The reason for this "long delay" is because a difficulty of performing experiment under an ideal condition which the most of theories need to assume; namely, the flame must be perfectly spherical without any disturbance.…”
Section: Impact Of Microgravity Environment For Studies On Droplet Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for arrays in convective conditions, this parameter has been used as a measure of droplet to droplet interaction [14,15]. Characteristic limiting values of ᐉ for interaction to occur have been measured approximately to 20 to 30 droplet diameters [15]. However, droplet clouds are considered to be more effective in preventing single droplet burning, with values of interdroplet distance reaching 50 diameters in laminar sprays of monodisperse droplets [3].…”
Section: S Russo and A Gomezmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for arrays in convective conditions, this parameter has been used as a measure of droplet to droplet interaction [14,15]. Characteristic limiting values of ᐉ for interaction to occur have been measured approximately to 20 to 30 droplet diameters [15].…”
Section: S Russo and A Gomezmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation