Child Advocacy Centers provide a child-friendly environment for the forensic interview and subsequent investigation of child victimization cases. However, very little research has examined the effects of burnout, secondary trauma and organizational stressors on forensic interviewers. The present study examined the following research questions. To what extent do forensic interviewers experience burnout and secondary trauma associated with their profession? How do organizational stressors increase these outcomes among interviewers? Data were collected by conducting an online survey of interviewers working at Child Advocacy Centers across the United States. Results indicate burnout and secondary trauma among interviewers in this sample. Decreased job support, increased funding constraints and heavy agency caseloads all result in burnout and secondary trauma. Policy recommendations include continued training and mental health services for interviewers. Future researchers should conduct qualitative interviews and examine how other factors, such as forensic interviewing protocols, influence interviewers' job experience and mental health. K E Y W O R D S burnout, child abuse, forensic interviewers, mental health, secondary trauma 1 | INTRODUCTION Every year, approximately 311,000 children undergo forensic interviews at Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) across the United States (National Children's Alliance, 2014). The forensic interview is an unbiased, structured interview to uncover potential abuse, as part of a criminal investigation. During the forensic interview, the child often reveals a deeply held secret that she/he has been physically, sexually or emotionally abused. Although the forensic interviewing process is designed to avoid revictimization, only a small body of research has examined the effect of these interviews on forensic