Introduction: Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is a critical component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). However, little research revealed its intraoperative implementation by anesthesiologists, who are on the front line defending against surgical pain. Therefore, the objective of our study is to assess the adherence of anesthesiologists to MMA comprehensively. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving patients undergoing lung resection, knee arthroplasty, and radical mastectomy from pre/post-implementation year of MMA (Jan 1, 2013, to Dec 31, 2013, vs. 2019. Intraoperative analgesia regimens (analgesic mode) and hourly rated morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were compared. In addition, patient characteristics associated with continued opioid use after surgery, surgical types, and position level of anesthesiologists (attending-junior; above attending-senior) were also analyzed. Results: After MMA initiation, the rate of multimodal analgesic regimen (mode C 2) was significantly increased (post-vs. pre-implementation, 31.57 vs. 21.50%, p \ 0.05). However, MME did not show significant difference (post-vs. pre-implementation, 0.402 vs. 0.456, p [ 0.05). Patient-level predictors of persistent opioid use after surgery were not related to increased analgesic mode. Lung resection [coefficient, -0.538; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.695 to -0.383, p \ 0.001] and knee arthroplasty (coefficient, -1.143; 95% CI, -1.366 to -0.925, p \ 0.001) discouraged multiple analgesic mode, while senior anesthesiologists (coefficient, 0.674; 95% CI 0.548-0.800, p \ 0.001) promoted it. Conclusions: Although anesthesiologists used more analgesics after promoting MMA, the ''opioid-sparing'' principle was not followed properly. The analgesic mode was not instructed by patients' characteristics appropriately. In addition, surgeries with cumbersome preparation/process impeded the use of multiple Y. He Á G. Tan (&) Á Y. Huang (&)