2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burnout in Ophthalmology Residency: A National Survey

Abstract: Purpose To determine prevalence of burnout in ophthalmology residents in the United States using the Maslach Burnout Inventory—Human Services Survey and to identify factors associated with burnout and wellness. Methods Anonymous survey distributed to residents via residency program directors. Results Ninety-one programs out of 113 (80.5%) confirmed survey distribution. Of 267 included respondents, 23 (8.6%) met criteria for high burnout, and 169 (63.3%) met criteria for at least one asp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details regarding the diagnosis criteria for occupational burnout, and burnout subscale criteria used in each study are provided in Appendix F. In total, 1408 study participants were included in this systematic review from all the included studies. Six studies (Alotaibi et al., 2019; Dyrbye et al., 2018; Muscatello et al., 2006; Shanafelt et al., 2012; Tran et al., 2018; Viviers et al., 2008) used the Maslach Burnout Inventory Score (Maslach et al., 1986) to measure the prevalence of burnout, with the exception of the other 3 studies (Cruz et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2018; Nair et al., 2017) which used self-reported measures (questionnaire). There were 8 cross-sectional studies (Alotaibi et al., 2019; Dyrbye et al., 2018; Feng et al., 2018; Muscatello et al., 2006; Nair et al., 2017; Tran et al., 2018; Viviers et al., 2008) and 1 prospective cohort study (Cruz et al., 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Details regarding the diagnosis criteria for occupational burnout, and burnout subscale criteria used in each study are provided in Appendix F. In total, 1408 study participants were included in this systematic review from all the included studies. Six studies (Alotaibi et al., 2019; Dyrbye et al., 2018; Muscatello et al., 2006; Shanafelt et al., 2012; Tran et al., 2018; Viviers et al., 2008) used the Maslach Burnout Inventory Score (Maslach et al., 1986) to measure the prevalence of burnout, with the exception of the other 3 studies (Cruz et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2018; Nair et al., 2017) which used self-reported measures (questionnaire). There were 8 cross-sectional studies (Alotaibi et al., 2019; Dyrbye et al., 2018; Feng et al., 2018; Muscatello et al., 2006; Nair et al., 2017; Tran et al., 2018; Viviers et al., 2008) and 1 prospective cohort study (Cruz et al., 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies (Alotaibi et al., 2019; Dyrbye et al., 2018; Muscatello et al., 2006; Shanafelt et al., 2012; Tran et al., 2018; Viviers et al., 2008) used the Maslach Burnout Inventory Score (Maslach et al., 1986) to measure the prevalence of burnout, with the exception of the other 3 studies (Cruz et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2018; Nair et al., 2017) which used self-reported measures (questionnaire). There were 8 cross-sectional studies (Alotaibi et al., 2019; Dyrbye et al., 2018; Feng et al., 2018; Muscatello et al., 2006; Nair et al., 2017; Tran et al., 2018; Viviers et al., 2008) and 1 prospective cohort study (Cruz et al., 2007). Studies were conducted in Asia (Feng et al., 2018), the Middle East (Alotaibi et al., 2019), Europe (Tran et al., 2018), and North America (Cruz et al., 2007; Dyrbye et al., 2018; Muscatello et al., 2006; Nair et al., 2017; Shanafelt et al., 2012; Viviers et al., 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, 236 responses represent a small fraction of ophthalmology residents in the United States, though this is similar to previous national ophthalmology resident surveys. 10,18 Residents with concerns about COVID-19 or those impacted more strongly by COVID-19 may be more likely to participate, which may have biased the results by overestimating the impact of the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%