Burrs - Analysis, Control and Removal 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00568-8_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burr Formation in Drilling Intersecting Holes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leitz develops two kinematical process models describing tool exit and entry conditions, as well as the calculation of remaining material when drilling intersecting holes. The combination of these process models and experimental results enables well funded declarations on burr position and shape depending on intersection geometry [96].…”
Section: Mechanics Of Burr Formation/analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leitz develops two kinematical process models describing tool exit and entry conditions, as well as the calculation of remaining material when drilling intersecting holes. The combination of these process models and experimental results enables well funded declarations on burr position and shape depending on intersection geometry [96].…”
Section: Mechanics Of Burr Formation/analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduction in feed rate likewise increases the predictability of the initial breakthrough position and hence the behavior of the chip formation. Lower feed rates and higher inclination angles of the exit surface will provide fewer burrs; this is also supported by Leitz, Franke, and Aurich [19] that build upon an earlier model developed by Min [20]. Figure 6 illustrates two exit surfaces with different slope angles.…”
Section: Burr Formationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In the majority of drilling operations, burrs will form as the drill enters and exits the part. In a study of German automotive and machine tool industries, Leitz, Aurich, and Franke [28] focused on costs associated with burr minimization, deburring, and part cleaning. Their findings revealed that burrs cause an increase of about 15% in manpower and cycle-time expense, a 2% share in the rejection rate and a 4% share in machine breakdown times.…”
Section: Deburring Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%