2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2005.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burrow systems of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus Milne Edwards, 1867)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total precipitation was 415 mm in 2006. The soil of the area was sandy and loamy Chestnut soil (Scheibler et al, 2006).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total precipitation was 415 mm in 2006. The soil of the area was sandy and loamy Chestnut soil (Scheibler et al, 2006).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a few numbers of Merion species burrow systems have been described briefly by Naumov and Lobachev (1975), Eygelis (1980), Yigit et al (1995), Shenbrot et al (2002), Scheibler et al (2006) and Demı rbaş and Pamukoglu (2008). Data on burrows are in sharp contrast with those obtained in northwest of the Persian jird's range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ilikler (1974) mentioned that there are food storage chambers in the burrows of M. tristrami. Scheibler et al (2006) examined burrow structures of M. unguiculatus Milne-Edwards, 1867 in northern China, near the cities Baochang and Xilinhot. Furthermore they described three burrow types including summer, winter and temporary in concordance with Naumov and Lobachev (1975) and we described different types of burrow for the M. persicus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little is known about the ecology and population dynamics of wild Mongolian gerbils (Agren et al 1989a;Liu et al 2007;Scheibler et al 2006;Wang and Zhong 2006). Studies of within-year variation in the demography of small rodents need monthly or bimonthly livetrapping and rigorous statistical models for the accurate estimation of demographic parameters Slade 2006, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%