Burrowing constrains patterns of skull shape evolution in wrasses

Abstract

The evolution of behavioral and ecological specialization can have marked effects on the tempo and mode of phenotypic evolution. Head-first burrowing has been shown to exert powerful selective pressures on the head and body shapes of many vertebrate and invertebrate taxa. In wrasses, burrowing behaviors have evolved multiple times independently, and are commonly used in foraging and predator avoidance behaviors. While recent studies have examined the kinematics and body shape morphology associated with this behavior, no study to-date has examined the macroevolutionary implications of burrowing on patterns of phenotypic diversification in this clade. Here, we use three-dimensional geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods to study the evolution of skull shape in fossorial wrasses and their relatives. We test for skull shape differences between burrowing and non burrowing wrasses and evaluate hypotheses of shape convergence among the burrowing wrasses. We also quantify rates of skull shape evolution between burrowing and non burrowing wrasses to test for whether burrowing constrains or accelerates rates of skull shape evolution in this clade. We find that while burrowing and non burrowing wrasses exhibit similar degrees of morphological disparity, for burrowing wrasses, it took nearly twice as long to amass this disparity. Furthermore, while the disparities between groups are evenly matched, we find that most burrowing species are confined to a particular region of shape space with most species exhibiting narrower heads than many non-burrowing species. These results suggest head-first burrowing constrains patterns of skull shape diversification in wrasses by potentially restricting the range of phenotypes that can perform this behavior.

Evolutionary Patterns of Modularity in the Linkage Systems of the Skull in Wrasses and Parrotfishes

“…We quantified 3D skull shape across 205 labrid species using microcomputed tomography ( μ CT) scans (previously detailed in Larouche et al. 2022 and Evans et al. 2022 ).…”

“…Teleost skulls have been the subject of multiple modularity studies ( Evans et al. 2017 , 2019 , 2022 ; Ornelas-García et al. 2017 ; Baumgart and Anderson 2018 ; Larouche et al.…”

Phylogenomics reveals the deep ocean as an accelerator for evolutionary diversification in anglerfishes

“…Colonization of new environments is generally believed to be a precursor to evolutionary radiation 58 . Yet, some environments should be inherently more constraining than others, potentially because there are few available niches or the challenges of that habitat only have a few viable solutions 14,50 . We examined the push-and-pull of these factors on evolution in the anglerfishes (Lophiiformes) with three guiding hypotheses (Table 1).…”

“…There are few barriers to dispersal which should limit speciation [43][44][45] (but see [46][47][48][49] ). Further, the environmental challenges in the deep pelagic zone should impose constraints on evolution, limiting the number of viable phenotypes 14 and thereby reducing rates of phenotypic evolution 50 . Phenotypic constraints associated with a particular habitat can be detected using a model-fitting approach, with an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) model being most consistent with this type of constraint (Table 1).…”

How to tuna fish: constraint, convergence and integration in the neurocranium of pelagiarian fishes

“…In contrast to structurally complex biodiverse settings like coral reefs (Roberts et al, 2002; Rabosky et al, 2018), it might seem environmentally homogenous, but the wide range of light levels, temperatures, currents, and food availability creates a surprising diversity of ecological niches that may drive adaptation. Most research on the phenotypic evolution of marine fishes focuses on clades (Larouche et al 2022; Evans et al 2022) or assemblages (Claverie and Wainwright, 2014) principally associated with shallow-water, coastal settings, often in proximity to reefs. However, recent surveys of fishes across marine habitats reveal that some settings are unexpected hotspots of phenotypic evolution (Friedman et al 2019; Martinez et al 2021).…”