2015
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1059381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bus Rapid Transit System in Istanbul: A Success Story or Flawed Planning Decision?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Istanbul, Turkey), station and bus overcrowding, lack of integration with other urban transit systems, or lack of supporting infrastructure around some stations, may have limited the overall benefits by rendering active travel less attractive or safe. 80 …”
Section: Panel 2 Scaled-up Interventions From Around the Globe: Bus mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Istanbul, Turkey), station and bus overcrowding, lack of integration with other urban transit systems, or lack of supporting infrastructure around some stations, may have limited the overall benefits by rendering active travel less attractive or safe. 80 …”
Section: Panel 2 Scaled-up Interventions From Around the Globe: Bus mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another significant conclusion was that macroscale urban structure traits (such as density, mixedness, and connectedness) fit better into TOD requirements in Iranian cities than microscale ones such as streetscape characteristics. The evidence from other developing countries also confirms this; while urban density in the developing world, for example, is higher than its American, Australian, and European counterparts [76,77], design practices are still car-oriented, and pedestrian (social) activities are hindered in most urban environments in developing cities [75], such as using subway bridges and tunnels for pedestrian crossings [77], narrow lanes and lack of parking for cyclists at stations [78], dedicating the whole frontage of houses to vehicle access found in new developments [79], wide streets and large setbacks [80], the dearth of urban design promotions, i.e., streetscape improvement [76] and green areas [81], and poor physical integration of transit nodes with the surrounding environment [80,82,83]. This is important because macro or structural features are even more troublesome to modify than streetscape or street design.…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dodero et al (2014) noted that BRT systems in several cities have begun to experience problems of capacity. Babalik-Sutcliffe and Cengiz (2015) reported that Istanbul's BRT system has attracted mixed opinions regarding its performance, with BRT failing to provide necessary capacity to meet its high demands, and with other design and planning-related issues such as a lack of passing lanes at stations and poor system integration. Some studies have related facility bus capacity to intersection operation (Hidalgo et al 2013) and therefore traffic-based QOS.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%