2015
DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdv027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Cycle Dynamics under Rational Inattention

Abstract: 4Non-technical summary 5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
114
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
13
114
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This, firstly, reinforces the insight of Maćkowiak and Wiederholt (2015) that a single informational friction can replace the multitude of frictions typically used in DSGE models to generate empirically plausible responses to productivity and monetary shocks. Second, going beyond the results established by Maćkowiak and Wiederholt, our result also demonstrates that one does not even need any fundamental source of business cycle fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This, firstly, reinforces the insight of Maćkowiak and Wiederholt (2015) that a single informational friction can replace the multitude of frictions typically used in DSGE models to generate empirically plausible responses to productivity and monetary shocks. Second, going beyond the results established by Maćkowiak and Wiederholt, our result also demonstrates that one does not even need any fundamental source of business cycle fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…While the literature is mostly theoretical, there are now a few studies with a quantitative focus. In particular, Angeletos, Collard and Dellas (2015) and Huo and Takayama (2015a) explore a version of Angeletos and La'O (2013) ;Blanchard, L'Huillier and Lorenzoni (2013) estimate a simplified version of Lorenzoni (2009);Melosi (2014Melosi ( , 2016 estimates a variant of Woodford (2003);and Maćkowiak and Wiederholt (2015) calibrate a particular DSGE model with rational inattention. A notable difference with respect to these papers is the flexibility of expectation dynamics considered in this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entropy-based constraints are used by Mondria (2010), Sims (2003), or Maćkowiak andWiederholt (2009, 2015). For an n-dimensional normal variable η ∼ N(f K −1 ), entropy is a simple function of the determinant of variance-covariance matrix: n exp(−2κ).…”
Section: S4 Entropy-based Information Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luo (2008) shows that RI and HF deliver identical aggregate consumption growth movements, but at the individual level RI models deliver more consumption volatility due to the noise shocks (which are canceled out by aggregation). 41 In this section, we compare the different implications of HF and RI in the general equilibrium framework. Following Alessie and Lusardi (1997), we introduce HF into the FI-RE model specified in Section 2.1 by assuming that the utility function takes the following form:…”
Section: Comparison With Habit Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%