2014
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective

Abstract: Prior research suggests that business groups (BGs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
121
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(156 reference statements)
6
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But synergies can also be conditioned by the firm's external environment. For instance, in the emerging markets, capital-raising can be challenging without an existing reputation (Chittoor, Kale & Puranam, 2015;Khanna & Rivkin, 2001;Khanna & Palepu, 2000). In such a circumstance the financial synergy made possible in capital raising may swamp the "attention" costs of unrelated diversification.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But synergies can also be conditioned by the firm's external environment. For instance, in the emerging markets, capital-raising can be challenging without an existing reputation (Chittoor, Kale & Puranam, 2015;Khanna & Rivkin, 2001;Khanna & Palepu, 2000). In such a circumstance the financial synergy made possible in capital raising may swamp the "attention" costs of unrelated diversification.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this unexpected result could be the following -although existing research (e.g., Khanna and Palepu, 2000) mainly views business groups in India as a response to institutional voids in the pre-liberalization era, their continued presence and even growth in the post-liberalization era could suggest that they play a facilitating role in helping affiliated companies adapt to institutional change (Chittoor et al, 2008;Guillen, 2000;Yiu et al, 2005). The results could also indicate that affiliation with business groups is complementary to the reforms, as argued by Chittoor et al (2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In agreement with previous research on BG affiliation for Indian firms (Khanna and Palepu 2000;Chittoor et al 2014), we adopt CMIE's classification of firms to identify whether an individual firm belonged to a business group or it was a stand-alone firm.…”
Section: Randd and Marketing Intensity (Randd And Mktg)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To control for the effect of other factors which also may affect the variables of interest in our study, a comprehensive set of other variables are included (Khanna and Palepu 2000;Chittoor et al 2014) such as firm size, research and development intensity, marketing intensity, business group affiliation, and industry dummy.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation