2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22056-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business IT Alignment from Business Model to Enterprise Architecture

Abstract: In this paper, we show how business model modelling can be connected to IT infrastructure, drawing parallels from enterprise architecture models such as ArchiMate. We then show how the proposed visualization based on enterprise architecture, with a strong focus on business model strategy, can help IT alignment, at both the business model and the IT infrastructure level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was later adopted in strategic management and technology and innovation management literature (Lambert and Davidson 2013;Zott et al 2011). Since then, academic literature on BMs has expanded rapidly, focusing on definitions, components and elements, ontologies and concepts (e.g., Afuah and Tucci 2003;Al-Debei and Avison 2010;Bouwman and Van den Ham 2003;Bouwman et al 2008;El Sawy and Pereira 2013;Gordijn et al 2000;Osterwalder and Pigneur 2002) and, more recently, on BMs and strategy (Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart 2010;Hedman and Kalling 2003;Teece 2010;Amit 2008, 2010) and on BM design and tooling for innovating and redesigning services De Reuver et al 2013;Fritscher and Pigneur 2011;Heikkilä 2010, 2013). At the same time, businesses as well as consultants embraced Osterwalder and Pigneur's (2010) CANVAS model, and as a result, BM thinking found its way into various industries (Al-Debei and Avison 2010).…”
Section: Business Model Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was later adopted in strategic management and technology and innovation management literature (Lambert and Davidson 2013;Zott et al 2011). Since then, academic literature on BMs has expanded rapidly, focusing on definitions, components and elements, ontologies and concepts (e.g., Afuah and Tucci 2003;Al-Debei and Avison 2010;Bouwman and Van den Ham 2003;Bouwman et al 2008;El Sawy and Pereira 2013;Gordijn et al 2000;Osterwalder and Pigneur 2002) and, more recently, on BMs and strategy (Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart 2010;Hedman and Kalling 2003;Teece 2010;Amit 2008, 2010) and on BM design and tooling for innovating and redesigning services De Reuver et al 2013;Fritscher and Pigneur 2011;Heikkilä 2010, 2013). At the same time, businesses as well as consultants embraced Osterwalder and Pigneur's (2010) CANVAS model, and as a result, BM thinking found its way into various industries (Al-Debei and Avison 2010).…”
Section: Business Model Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfaction: e.g., service level; SERVQUAL or SERVPERF; satisfaction barometer; # of customer complaints; level of billing errors; cycle time to respond to customer complaints S4. Sustainability: viability; loyalty; level of customer churn; customer retention (Dubosson-Torbay et al 2002;Eckerson 2009;Edvinsson and Malone 1997;Ghalayini et al 1997;Heikkilä et al 2014;Johnson 2010;Johnson et al 2008;Kaplan and Norton 1992, 1993Keegan et al 1989;Neely et al 2002;Smith 2006;Tseng et al 2009;Venkatraman and Ramanujam 1986) Service-related Technology T1. Architectural complexity: # of applications; architecture-related indicators; platform-related indicators; cloud-related metrics; time for software and hardware implementation; extensibility T2.…”
Section: Business Model Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, Meertens et al [32] describe a mapping between ArchiMate and an upper level information system layer (Business Model Ontology) to fill the lacks of ArchiMate. Fritsher and Pigneur also propose a mapping between BMO and ArchiMate [33], with the focus on visualisation, but the mapping rules are not provided. We have some similarities with the work of Meertens et al: materialised solutions and techniques (practice), business-application mapping, and insurance case studies.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the Archimate framework can be used to formally describe the architectural perspective of the ecosystem, since it is considered to be a comprehensive framework that can visually represent the ecosystem in three layers-Business, Application and Technology-and considers the structural, behavioral, and informational aspects within each layer [18,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%