Business Model Adaptation to the COVID-19 Crisis: Strategic Response of the Spanish Cultural and Creative Firms

Abstract

Surviving in a humanitarian disaster such as the COVID-19 pandemic is a big challenge for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises in all industries. Furthermore, cultural and creative firms face additional challenges. Many of those firms have survived the effects of the pandemic by proposing redesigned business models that have brought new added value in response to environmental hostility; they have strategically responded to the crises by adapting their business model. According to the extant literature, in VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous) environments, dynamic capabilities are developed to detect and seize new opportunities and reconfigure the company’s assets. However, in very hostile environments, such as the COVID-19 crisis, the dynamic capabilities approach fails to explain the firm owners’ strategic decisions. A cross-case comparative analysis of ten micro and small firms in Spain’s cultural and creative industries has been conducted to examine how enterprises adapted to the COVID-19 crisis and the different organizational capabilities they implemented. This work proposes a new framework that postulates that business model adaptation is better understood under the emergency management theory and improvisational capability, instead of only under the dynamic capabilities lens. Organizational proximity in the diffusion of innovations under the open innovation paradigm is also critical to understanding the business model adaptation. From an academic perspective, this article enriches the current understanding of business model asdaptation by micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises in very hostile environments. The new framework intends to offer managers concrete guidelines about systematically adapting their business models in hostile situations.

The Influence of the Credibility of Social Media Influencers SMIs on the Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: Evidence from Saudi Arabia

“…Somehow, several of them used strategies that are compatible with the new changes in the world. The pandemic further accelerated that change, and it impacted businesses marketing practices [2].…”

Strategies in Managing Challenges of The Kuala Lumpur Performing Arts Centre (KLPAC) during Uncertain Times: A Reflection and A Way Forward

“…The POV (Point of View) technique to simulate audience interactivity was an innovation that emerged out of the so-called limitations brought on by the pandemic. Post-pandemic, this ingenious idea is an example of how the Emergency Management Theory came into play as proposed in Peñarroya-Farell and Miralles (2022). This invention first took centre stage at the IUCEL2022 Proceedings 433 Description of the Research/ Innovation/ Invention/ Design by proposing a technique of creation and presentation to an online audience, via the POV technique introduced by Braverman (2014).…”

Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on Dissemination of Innovative E-Learning Tools in Higher Education in Poland

“…There is research on new models of open innovation for businesses [ 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ], especially for digital companies [ 63 ], which are an achievable direction in Industry 4.0 [ 64 ]. Business models have also recently been a subject for research related to the pandemic; for example, they refer to the COVID-19 crisis [ 65 ], mobile market during COVID-19 [ 13 ], COVID-19 transformation of an urban public transport system [ 66 ], management after COVID-19 [ 67 ], and identification of digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 68 , 69 ]. When it comes to Industry 4.0 and innovations, many scientists are carrying out studies on the competitiveness and effectiveness of an open business model in Industry 4.0 [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 ], enhancing creative intensity and profit on the open-source digital platforms [ 75 , 76 ], evolution of technology [ 77 , 78 ], expanding technology acceptance [ 79 ], and many more topics—also referring to responsible research and innovation [ 80 ].…”