“…In general, these earlier findings highlighted the significant variance among entrepreneurial firms' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis (e.g., Hadjielias et al, 2022 ; Sharma et al, 2022 ), including their reliance on digital technologies ( Giotopoulos et al, 2022 ; Khurana et al, 2022 ; Soluk, 2022 ; Soluk et al, 2021 ; Wendt et al, 2021 ). At the same time, these studies highlighted several factors that could have influenced how such firms responded (for a review, see Sharma et al, 2022 ), including their status as family firms (e.g., Hadjielias et al, 2022 ; Kraus et al, 2020 ; Soluk et al, 2021 ), industry affiliation ( Bartik et al, 2020 ; Giotopoulos et al, 2022 ), organizational size ( Bartik et al, 2020 ; Kraus et al, 2020 ; Wendt et al, 2021 ), involvement in global commerce and supply chains ( Wendt et al, 2021 ), the commandment of dynamic capabilities ( Dejardin et al, 2022 ) and resource allocation skills ( Soluk, 2022 ), the individual entrepreneurial orientation and management style of the firm owners ( Emami et al, 2021 ; Khurana et al, 2022 ; Kusa et al, 2022 ), financial resources built on their past financial performance ( Bartik et al, 2020 ), their regional embedding ( Hammerschmidt et al, 2021 ; Wendt et al, 2021 ), an innovation-friendly culture ( Giotopoulos et al, 2022 ) and inclusion in business networks ( Khurana et al, 2022 ; Xie et al, 2022 ). While these factors need not function in the same way for preparation forms of organizational resilience as for coping and adaption forms ( Duchek, 2020 ), we build on such prior work and examine these contextual characteristics as potential moderators of the general digitalization–resilience relationship.…”