2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40070-015-0050-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business process analytics: a dedicated methodology through a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 illustrates such a methodology that exhibits a phase of business understanding as to the initiating phase. The rationale of this phase is to help the analyst arrive at a stage of reflection where she has a clear understanding of the business context, and where she can assess how alternative actions can contribute to the business objectives (Delias, Doumpos, & Matsatsinis, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates such a methodology that exhibits a phase of business understanding as to the initiating phase. The rationale of this phase is to help the analyst arrive at a stage of reflection where she has a clear understanding of the business context, and where she can assess how alternative actions can contribute to the business objectives (Delias, Doumpos, & Matsatsinis, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having said that, we assume that the proposed methodology should be encapsulated in a greater decision support approach that suggests some prior preparations (that can be wrapped with the evocative label of “business understanding” and commonly includes actions like defining project’s scope and assumptions, developing the shape of solutions, etc.,) and some winding up actions (the monitoring and deployment of the solutions, the decision aid to the stakeholders). The positioning of the proposed methodology in an integrated analytics project is illustrated in Figure 1, where the background chart, which depicts the general project phases is adopted from Delias et al (2015). In that chart, “A” is the starting point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%