2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-40417-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Process as a Service—A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paves way for the elastic business process management software (BPMS) in multi‐tenant cloud. Moreover, the BPMS is also widespread with the evolution of information technology (IT) solutions 9,10 . Autonomic management of resources in multi‐tenant cloud enables automatic sharing of resources to cloud users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paves way for the elastic business process management software (BPMS) in multi‐tenant cloud. Moreover, the BPMS is also widespread with the evolution of information technology (IT) solutions 9,10 . Autonomic management of resources in multi‐tenant cloud enables automatic sharing of resources to cloud users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between process management and knowledge resources in the context of emerging digital innovations is currently the subject of intense pages: [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Engineering Management in Production and Services Badakhshan et al, 2019;BPM, 2020;BPM, 2021b). Until 2020, relatively little attention was paid by researchers and practitioners to the IT systems' importance for the integration of process and knowledge management, including the integration with business stakeholders (the environment), which is key in building relational capital (Gupta, Iyer & Aronson, 2000;Pant et al, 2011;Sanchez et al, 2011;Hove, von Rosing & Storms, 2015;Brajer-Marczak, 2016;Pereira, Barbosa & Duarte, 2020;Sobolewska & Bitkowska, 2020;Szelagowski & Lupeikiene, 2020;Grisold et al, 2021;Gzik, 2020). A dynamic change in this context occurred with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which re-evaluated many of the strategies and systems used so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%