2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2014
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2014.469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Process Modeling Language for Performance Evaluation

Abstract: Evaluation of business processes is important for analysis and improvement of an organization. Different methods are used to evaluate the performance like statistics or visualization. However, these methods meet demands mainly on the top organizational level. There is insufficient support to evaluate processes at the process managerial level leading to a limited visibility of deficiencies in business processes at process level. In this paper, we address this challenge and focus on the relation between evaluati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilize TD-ABC [20], [55], [73] 3 (4%) Utilize RCA [56], [62] 2 (3%) Group costs by levels (high, medium, low, etc.) [24], [80] 2 (3%)…”
Section: (12%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilize TD-ABC [20], [55], [73] 3 (4%) Utilize RCA [56], [62] 2 (3%) Group costs by levels (high, medium, low, etc.) [24], [80] 2 (3%)…”
Section: (12%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative category to include cost analysis with a process perspective is to group costs into several ranges. This is done by the authors of [24] and of [80]. In both publications, the followed procedure is similar, starting with a BPMN model, followed by a classification of costs (low, medium, or high).…”
Section: (12%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance is usually evaluated in the form of quantitative measurements which help to indicate about quality. Business processes and its elements are evaluated in different dimensions like time, cost, and quality (Lodhi et al 2014). For each of these performance dimensions different key performance indicators can be defined such as (van der Aalst 2013a): lead time, service time, waiting time, resource utilisation, number of complains or number of product defects, etc.…”
Section: Robotic Process Automation and Business Process Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance perspective of business processes, however, has been disregarded up to date and, as far as we know, there are not solid proposals that address variability in it. This perspective is concerned with the definition of performance requirements addressing different performance dimensions such as time, cost and quality [22], and it is usually expressed as a set of Process Performance Indicators (PPIs). PPIs are quantifiable metrics that allow the evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of business processes and can be measured using data generated within the process [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%