2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31232-3_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Process Modeling Languages: A Comparative Framework

Abstract: Underlying any Business Process Management (BPM) project is the need to represent business processes, using an appropriate language. In this paper, based on a thorough review of the relevant literature, we made a comparative analysis of five business process modeling languages, widely used in the context of BPM projects. The main objective is to understand the strengths and major limitations of each one, in order to draw a comparative perspective between them. For this purpose, we have created a comparative fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many different modeling languages nowadays for BPM and its visualization. Therefore, the five most recognizable languages have been chosen according to Pereira and Silva (2016). These are the Business Process Model and Notation 2.0 (BPMN 2.0), which is considered the standard, the Event-driven Process Chain (EPC), the Unified Modeling Language -Activity Diagrams (UML-AD) created by the Object Management Group, the Integration DEFintion (IDEF), Role Activity Diagram (RAD).…”
Section: Different Business Process Modeling Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different modeling languages nowadays for BPM and its visualization. Therefore, the five most recognizable languages have been chosen according to Pereira and Silva (2016). These are the Business Process Model and Notation 2.0 (BPMN 2.0), which is considered the standard, the Event-driven Process Chain (EPC), the Unified Modeling Language -Activity Diagrams (UML-AD) created by the Object Management Group, the Integration DEFintion (IDEF), Role Activity Diagram (RAD).…”
Section: Different Business Process Modeling Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To express the behavior of the ABSM on the top of M St-A , M Op-I and M Op-A metamodels in the subject domain independent way we need to explicitly describe tools, components and methods that are traditionally used for creating ABSM. To create the top level specification (M Op ) the wieldy known workflow approach can be utilized [8,9], where behavioral aspects of ABMS methodology is expressed as a sequence of operations glued together by the predefined set of operators. In the course of the current research M Op has rather simple structure (see below) but it can be improved and extended in the future.…”
Section: B Absm Implementation Tools Metamodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these subtasks is determined by the selected classes of technical state dynamics (k = 1..K) for X element type and information levels (m = 1..M): (ITS11 → … → ITS1M → ITS21 →… → ITSKM) (9) For each stage of identification process an appropriate knowledge base and a variety of computing modules have to be developed. Some examples can be found in [11,12].…”
Section: A Unique Mechanical Systems Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three groups of notations identified in the result of the analysis [20]: notations that allow us to describe business rules (IDEF3, BPMN, ARIS eEPC) [21]; notations aimed to develop specifications based on flowcharts (Basic Flowchart, Cross Functional Flowchart) [22]; notations using the object-oriented approach (Unified Modeling Language, UML) [23].…”
Section: Conceptual Basis Of the Graphical Requirements Analysis (Gramentioning
confidence: 99%